TECHNET Archives

July 2004

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Anslow, Phillip" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Tue, 13 Jul 2004 17:26:32 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (203 lines)
Roger,
I agree largely with Bill and Valerie.

This is an old chestnut to-ing and fro-ing between fabricators who wish to
match to their preferred process and material supply, and design houses/end
users. For end users, the pain of having a working design change PCB
supplier which results in re-engineering to get it working again should not
be underestimated when contemplating a change of supplier.

Having worked in military, commercial telecoms & RF, I have experienced this
but in GHz designs or safety related areas (particularly air carry) it is
critical that designs proven and certified with specified materials, builds
and topologies are not tampered with. I have even experienced one design
supplied by two different fabricators which were compliant with drawing
specification and limits but one supplier's boards worked first time every
time, the other supplier's boards unfortunately, did not (it cost many $s in
post-mortem to find out why).

On less sensitive designs (a very grey area to define), I would agree with
Jeffrey that the PCB Fab House should be allowed freedom in final build
subject to technical appraisal - but not just commercial $cost criteria.


So responding to your question in that TechNet time honoured cliché of "it
depends", it really does come down to a case by case evaluation of
certification level, sensitivity of design, application, environment and
working with your supplier base to target critical designs with
Purchasing/Supply Chain Management awareness. The key is to be aware of
design options early in the process, but having certified a design, stick
with the build specified.

My humble two-bobs worth.

Regards,
Phil.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kasprzak, Bill (sys) USX [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 13 July 2004 15:35
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Board Stack geometry


               *** WARNING ***

This mail has originated outside your organization,
either from an external partner or the Global Internet.

     Keep this in mind if you answer this message.


Roger,

I'm thinking that purchasing can't be allowed to change board houses unless
the new board house can build the board with the same stack up. I know that
in qualified military hardware this change could not be allowed because the
new board is not the same as the one that was qualified. We would have to do
a "delta" qual test that would be agreeable to all parties involved.

When changing board stackups with a qualified design, then the cost of a
"delta" qual test must be subtracted from the cost savings incurred in the
first place. Then only a true measure of savings would be realized. You'll
generally find that you'll be ahead of the game if you stick with the
original stack up.

My 2 cents worth.

Bill Kasprzak
Moog Inc., Systems Group, Process Engineer


-----Original Message-----
From: Roger Stoops [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 9:05 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Board Stack geometry


This brings up a question I have had bumping around in my head for a while,
for example:

A pcb has been designed, assembled, tested, and now goes through FCC and CE
emissions and susceptibility testing.  The board stack was determined by the
pcb vendor.  The assembly passes first time.  Purchasing or the EMS finds a
less expensive yet reliable board house and buys production boards from this
new house.  The new house changes the board stack to their preferred lay-up.

Would not this board need re-testing for FCC/CE emissions/susceptibility?
For boards requiring this type of testing, would not a board stack specified
on the print be required?

TIA and much appreciated,

Roger Stoops


-----Original Message-----
From: Jeffrey Bush [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2004 8:40 AM
Subject: Re: 7628 prepreg?


Common type, stable, low resin content and likely predicable thickness
is this is important.  Otherwise PCB house should be left to determine
the optimal stack for the board geometry and end use.



Jeffrey Bush
Director, Quality Assurance and Technical Support

                          76 Technology Drive - POB 1890
                             Brattleboro, Vermont 05302-1890
                                Tel. 802.257.4571.21 Fax. 802.257.0011
                                    [log in to unmask]
                              http://www.vtcircuits.com



-----Original Message-----
From: Brooks,Bill [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 5:08 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] 7628 prepreg?


Bill Brooks
PCB Design Engineer , C.I.D., C.I.I.
Tel: (760)597-1500 Ext 3772 Fax: (760)597-1510 http://pcbwizards.com

Why would a designer specify 7628 prepreg in the construction of a
board? What characteristics are unique to it? Bill Brooks, CID

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e To
unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or
(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET
Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the
posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the
archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please
visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for
additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------

********************************************************************
This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended
recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.
You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or
distribute its contents to any other person.
********************************************************************

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2