TECHNET Archives

July 2004

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Wed, 21 Jul 2004 07:51:36 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (172 lines)
Have they looked at the solderpot and analyzed the alloy - high copper
concentrations can effect intermetallic bonds - this coupled with a
surface tension created from poor micro-roughning may cause this.  It
does seem that some residue, maybe from LPI develop is present.  

I tried to simulate this in our HASL process and could not.  



Jeffrey Bush
Director, Quality Assurance and Technical Support

                          76 Technology Drive - POB 1890
                             Brattleboro, Vermont 05302-1890
                                Tel. 802.257.4571.21 Fax. 802.257.0011
                                    [log in to unmask]
                              http://www.vtcircuits.com	



-----Original Message-----
From: Marsico, James [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 7:34 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] PWB SOLDERABILITY


No, no nickel...

Our PWB supplier claims that he was able to repeat the problem by
"slightly" oxidizing the copper.  When they subjected bare copper boards
to an oven bake, completely oxidizing the copper, the results of the
HASL was non-wet areas.  When the bake was reduced, minimal oxidation,
he claims that he got the same results as the production PWBs, where the
pads were covered with solder, but, when subjected to a tape test, the
solder peeled off.

Luckily, this problem is only found on one part number (out of six that
were ordered), all of which were HASLed on the same day.  We are
returning all un-built boards and our supplier will strip the solder and
re-HASL.  My BIG problem now is, how do I screen the built-up
assemblies?  We built about 40 of these (quite expensive) assemblies and
we're assuming that about 20% are suspect.  My first action is to do a
tape test on the completed assemblies (on un-used pads) to try and weed
out some of the problem boards.  After that, I really don't know what to
do with the assemblies that passed the tape test.

Suggestions?

Jim Marsico
Senior Engineer
Production Engineering
EDO Electronics Systems Group
[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]> 631-595-5879



        -----Original Message-----
        From:   [log in to unmask] [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
        Sent:   Wednesday, July 21, 2004 6:07 AM
        To:     [log in to unmask]; [log in to unmask]
        Subject:        RE: [TN] PWB SOLDERABILITY

        Never, any chance they might have been nickel plated before
HASL?

        -----Original Message-----
        From: Marsico, James [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
        Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 8:29 PM
        To: [log in to unmask]
        Subject: [TN] PWB SOLDERABILITY


        Good Day Technet:

        Here's an unusual situation.  We recently got a lot of PWBs from
our
        supplier who we've been using for years.  The solder on the
boards
(HASL)
        looks good, thick and shiny.  A couple of weeks ago, after SMT
assembly with
        a fairly aggressive water soluble solder paste, we noticed that
one of the
        components (diode) had fallen off and was sitting on the
operator's bench.
        The pads on the board where the component had fallen off showed
bare copper,
        while the solder fillets remained on the component!  Thinking
that this was
        an unexplainable one-time occurrence, the component was soldered
back on and
        the board went on its merry way.  Well,  a couple of days later,
boards from
        the same lot were soldered and we noticed that some of unused
pads or test
        pads were copper only, with no traces of solder.  We then took
some bare
        boards, all of which looked good, and ran them trough our reflow
and in-line
        cleaning process (no flux or solder paste).   Low and behold, on
about 20%
        of the boards there were copper pads with no solder, and a few
pads where
        the solder was partially peeling off the pads, exposing the
copper
        underneath (with no traces of copper on the pealed solder).
After
        discussions with our supplier, we both came to the conclusion
that some of
        the boards must have been oxidized to such a degree that solder
coated the
        pads but did not achieve a metallurgical bond.  I would have
thought that
        such a condition would result in a de-wet or non-wet condition,
but, as I
        said earlier, the boards looked great!

        Has anyone else ever come across this before?

        Jim Marsico
        Senior Engineer
        Production Engineering
        EDO Electronics Systems Group
        [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
631-595-5879

        ---------------------------------------------------
        Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV
1.8e To
        unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following
text in the
        BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily
halt or
        (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]:
SET Technet
        NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the
posts: send
        e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the
archives of
        previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please visit
IPC web
        site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for
additional
        information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700
        ext.5315
        -----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e To
unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or
(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET
Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the
posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the
archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please
visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for
additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2