LEADFREE Archives

July 2004

Leadfree@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
MA/NY DDave <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
(Leadfree Electronics Assembly Forum)
Date:
Sat, 17 Jul 2004 02:01:55 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
Hi Intel-Jack, TI-DougR,Abbott , , IPC LF Listservers,

Jack, the chart came out aligned and readable both on the IPC list and in
the email when I moved it to Notepad.

It seems like this is going to change at least two tables in the standard,
that is: Table 4.1 and 5.2 ??

Any other significant changes like the profile, the ramp down, etc.


If you or one of the other component people have the chance to post, what
was the reason for adding a third thinner category and keeping it's
temperature exposure higher???


My guess is that this was a practical matter in that when the thicker
packages get to soldering temperature the smaller packages on the same
electronic assembly will have to withstand higher temperatures. Of course
it could have also been a bit of politics to obtain concurrence.


Yours in Engineering, Dave
Y i Engr, MA/NY DDave

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leadfee Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree
To temporarily stop delivery of Leadree for vacation breaks send: SET Leadfree NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2