LEADFREE Archives

June 2004

Leadfree@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Paul Chinery <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:58:04 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (125 lines)
Paul

I agree with your comments and would like to add a profound piece of
legislative interpretation.

We already know RoHS exempts high melting point, high temperature lead
typically used within components as die attach.  In addition, point 7 of the
RoHS Annex exempts "lead in the solders for servers, storage array systems,
network infrastructure.".  Regardless of whether or not the device is ASIC,
if its package were a BGA (or BGA derivative) used in one of the above
applications, one could argue that the solder balls are exempt.  There is no
reason to assume this solder exemption has to be externally introduced.

Moreover, in December 2003, Brussels attempted to clarify the term
'homogeneous' as "a unit that cannot be mechanically disjointed into single
materials".  Obviously solder can be mechanically disjointed by simply
applying heat, thereby placing it outside of the homogeneous component.

Kind regards

Paul

Paul Chinery
Managing Director
Dionics PLC
[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
www.dionics.co.uk <http://www.dionics.co.uk>
Tel: +44 (0)24 76 71 33 66
Fax: +44 (0)24 76 71 44 88

Dionics plc is an ISO 9001:2000 Registered Company (RS22865)

 <http://idofea.org/>


Dionics Plc accepts no liability for the content of this email, or for the
consequences of any actions taken on the basis of the information provided,
unless that information is subsequently confirmed in writing. Any views or
opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent those of the company. E-mail transmission cannot be
guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted,
corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions
in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail
transmission. If verification is required please request a hard-copy
version.



Dionics Plc is registered in England and Wales No. 2568427.

Registered Office is Fletchworth Gate, Coventry, CV5 6SP, United Kingdom
Tel. +44 (0) 24 76 71 33 66



-----Original Message-----
From: Leadfree [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of to Paul Taylor
Sent: 28 June 2004 09:29
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [LF] Leadfree exceptions for Rohs


Dave

Do you know how much lead it actually contains?  Are you talking about the
lead-frame or components (i.e soldered with high melting point solder)
contained within the package?
I agree with Ma/NY Dave, that you'll never get an exemption in advance.  it
would be absolute bedlam with every manufacturer of products applying so
that they can use up some old stock!!
If it is contained within the package, you will be ok as the whole point
about the RoHS is to avoid toxic compounds leaching into the environment,
and a sealed IC package would be ok.

As a talking point, this whole subject of components in the production
pipeline I believe is going to prove very difficult to manage, police and
document.  The component manufactures haven't helped a great deal as even
now, there are a great many components that are not available with a lead
free finish. Manufactures who have short turn round designs (i.e cell
phones) will have no trouble in cleaning their pipeline between 2005-2006,
however there is another huge slice of the manufactures whose product life
cycle is 5 years instead of 18months!! and who have speciality components
like ASIC included!.   These companies I doubt whether they can afford to
re-engineer every product and discard all the old stock (which by the way
would be worse as if it was used it could be reclaimed under the WEE
directive later, however if they dump them I expect it will be to the
landfills)

Also, if its the leadframe only, could you rely on maths for your
exemption.  One IC, say with 100 terminations (legs) would be ok is your
total leg count (IC and passives) was over 1000?  This would be less than
0.1%

regards
paul





Paul R Taylor
Senior Engineer, Product Supply Group
Pitney Bowes Ltd
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---Leadfee Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree
To temporarily stop delivery of Leadree for vacation breaks send: SET
Leadfree NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5315
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leadfee Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree
To temporarily stop delivery of Leadree for vacation breaks send: SET Leadfree NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2