TECHNET Archives

May 2004

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Tue, 25 May 2004 09:38:59 +0300
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (96 lines)
Jack

Interesting point, but an analogic argument can be applied to all those
who apply rigid standards where they are not necessary. If a product,
process or whatever does what it should do in an acceptable manner with
appropriate aids provided by the employer, then that is good enough. I
firmly believe that our industry is plagued by over-specification-itis.
This is often engendered by ignorance; a responsible person has no idea
what the ramifications of a process or product are so, instead of
learning what it does, he covers his ignorance by applying
specifications and standards, often irrelevant or far too severe, and
costing his employers an arm and a leg in consequence. I see many, many
examples of this in this forum, as well as visiting clients. In one
company which consulted me, the product was a range of cards for use in
ordinary PCs used in an office environment. I saved them ~40% of their
production costs and thereby increased their overall gross profitability
by ~10% simply by showing them that they did not have to build their
products to ultra-reliable military standards -- but it was a hard
battle convincing them.

I suggest that every manufacturing entity should carefully examine their
products and processes for over-specification-itis.

Sorry to diverge off-topic.

Brian

Jack Crawford wrote:
> Any related requirements have been or are being removed from IPC
> standards. The correct assessment is whether an individual can do the
> job they are required to do in an acceptable manner with appropriate
> aids that may need to be provided by the employer. For broader
> explanation, i.e. avoiding worker discrimination lawsuits, consult your
> HR about the Americans with Disabilities Act.
>
> Jack Crawford
> Director, Certification and Assembly Technology
> [log in to unmask]
> 847-790-5393
> fax 847-504-2393
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mary Jane Chism [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 2:37 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [TN] Visual Acuity
>
>
> Group,
>
> Is it mentioned anywhere in any of the IPC standards a visual acuity for
> solder inspection?  Thanks.
>
> Mary Jane Chism
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
> in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
> To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
> Search the archives of previous posts at:
> http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
> Please visit IPC web site
> http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
> information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700
> ext.5315
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
> To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
> Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
> Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2