TECHNET Archives

May 2004

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Dehoyos, Ramon" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Tue, 4 May 2004 04:58:11 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (66 lines)
> To:   'Brian Ellis'
> Subject:      RE: [TN] OA / RMA
>
>
>       Thanks Ellis:
>                       Could you expand on unforgiving of errors, requires good process control and good quality cleaning equipment rarer than you think.
>       Regards,
>       Ramon
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian Ellis [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2004 2:20 AM
> To:   TechNet E-Mail Forum.; Dehoyos, Ramon
> Subject:      Re: [TN] OA / RMA
>
> I installed the first OA (misnomer, WS is better) full scale
> wave-soldering production line in Switzerland (if not in Europe) as long
> ago as 1965. The company in question is still using it,four soldering
> machines later. I have since aided in many others, throughout the world.
> Advantages of WS:
> - better quality soldering with fewer rejects
> - more tolerant of poorly solderable components
> - widest operating window
> - no expensive cleaning products
> - minimal pollution from overall process
> - lowest production costs
> Disadvantages:
> - requires good process control
> - unforgiving of errors
> - good quality cleaning equipment rarer than you think
> - flux itself is fairly corrosive
> Summary:
> - requires a serious approach and qualification
> - with this proviso, this is the way to go.
>
> Brian
>
> Dehoyos, Ramon wrote:
> >                 Hi Technetters:
> >                 Has anybody done a comparison study of RMA/OA fluxes for wavesolder?  Or any personal experiences in this regard will be appreciated.
> >                 Thanks in Advance
> >                 Ramon
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------
> > Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
> > To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> > the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> > To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
> > To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
> > Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
> > Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
> > -----------------------------------------------------
> >
> >

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2