LEADFREE Archives

May 2004

Leadfree@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Kay Nimmo <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
(Leadfree Electronics Assembly Forum)
Date:
Wed, 12 May 2004 08:13:08 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (249 lines)
Hi Jerome/Fern

I think there will be some sort of unofficial Commission guidance issued
with the definition when it is finalised by the EU.  Could be in june?
or september? 
Kay

-----Original Message-----
From: Leadfree [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jerome Wagner
Sent: 11 May 2004 20:39
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [LF] Lead in resistors


Fern: If technical issues such as the one discussed in your note are not
defined by the regulators, it would be helpful if "standard
interpretations" were issued by someone, as we could be living with
these
regs for some time before court-issued clarifications emerge. I don't
want
to be out there all alone on the interpretations I make!

Could IPC issue standard interpretations? If not, will some other
industry
group? Perhaps the Joint Industry Group?

Thanks! jw

Jerry Wagner  Dept 0056  Environmental Engineering  B096-1
x56275  pg 58888-0658   (607)755-6275   fax: (607)755-6282
Huron Real Estate Associates, LLC  and  Endicott Interconnect
Technologies,
Inc.
Via the Internet: [log in to unmask]  [NOTES: Jerome
Wagner/Huron/EIT]

----- Forwarded by Jerome Wagner/Huron/EIT on 05/11/2004 03:35 PM -----

                      Fern Abrams
                      <[log in to unmask]>        To:
[log in to unmask]
                      Sent by: Leadfree        cc:
                      <[log in to unmask]        Subject:  Re: [LF] Lead
in resistors
                      >


                      05/06/2004 10:15
                      AM
                      Please respond to
                      "(Leadfree
                      Electronics
                      Assembly Forum)";
                      Please respond to
                      Fern Abrams






Just to clarify, IPC filed comments with the EU Technical Adaption
Committee regarding the need for clarification proposed definition of
LF:

"A maximum concentration value of 0.1% by weight in homogeneous
materials
for lead, mercury, hexavalent chromium, polybrominated biphenyls (PBB)
and
polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE) and of 0.01% weight in homogeneous
materials for cadmium shall be tolerated. Homogeneous material means a
unit
that can not be mechanically disjointed in single materials".

 While I have had no formal response, we have heard informally that this
is unlikely to be further clarified and may end up being settled in
court.

Fern Abrams
Director of Environmental Policy
IPC - The Association Connecting Electronics Industries
1333 H Street, NW, 11th Floor West
Washington, DC   20005
(202) 962-0460
fax (202) 962-0464
www.ipc.org




-----Original Message-----
From: Bev Christian [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 4:49 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [LF] Lead in resistors

Gordon,
No, not very comforting.

The IPC Materials Declaration Team has sent a letter to the appropriate
EU personnel asking for clarification of some of these issues, but to
the best of my knowledge Fern has still not received an answer.  This is
probably because they (EU) had not thought that far ahead when they
drafted the dreadful thing in the first place.  As more than one wag has
stated, we will probably have to wait for clarification when that first
unfortunate company is dragged into court.  Then we MIGHT get definitive
answers.
regards,
Bev Christian
Research in Motion

-----Original Message-----
From: Davy, Gordon [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: May 5, 2004 4:26 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [LF] Lead in resistors


Bill Haas has noted that 0402 surface-mount "lead-free" resistors were
found to contain more than 1000 ppm Pb, and that the suppliers assured
him that this is OK per the RoHS legislation. Bill wanted to know where
it says in the directive that what the resistor manufacturers told him
is so. Annex item 7 exempts Pb in "electronic ceramic parts (e.g.
piezoelectronic devices)", so it looks as if this is what they are
referring to.

What the Directive doesn't say anywhere, of course, is that for
components not exempted by the Annex the maximum allowable level is 1000
ppm, or how the limit (whatever it turns out to be) is to be calculated
- i.e., what is to be used as the fraction denominator: termination
finish, component as a whole, assembly as a whole, equipment as a whole.
Article 4 paragraphs 1 and 2 say that there can't be any Pb at all
except per the Annex, and paragraph 3 puts manufacturers on notice that
they may have to eliminate other stuff later.

Also not spelled out is how users of components - such as Bill - are
expected to document that the equipment items that they are selling are
Pb-free: will the envirocops be satisfied if the equipment manufacturer
can produce upon demand a certificate of compliance from the
manufacturers of each component? If not, how diligent does the original
equipment manufacturer have to be to ensure that no Pb above the
to-be-determined limit (except as permitted by the Annex) has crept into
his product?

As an analogy, hardware destined for space has long had a prohibition
against pure tin plating. Yet every time a satellite has been audited,
cases of pure tin plating have been found, due simply to human error.
Can you imagine the jeopardy of the manufacturer of an electronic
system, wondering if a particular item will be randomly selected to find
out if it contains Pb? (X-ray fluorescence will be useless for levels of
1000 ppm, so if that's the level that is finally chosen, we're talking
serious chemical analysis.)

Article 8 specifies that the penalties are to be "effective,
proportionate, and dissuasive." I don't see any language describing how
disagreements are to be resolved, or what happens to the equipment while
the matter is being settled. Not very comforting.

Gordon Davy
Baltimore, MD
[log in to unmask]
410-993-7399

------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------Leadfee Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV
1.8d To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following
text in the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree To
temporarily stop delivery of Leadree for vacation breaks send: SET
Leadfree NOMAIL Search previous postings at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700
ext.5315
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------

------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------Leadfee Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV
1.8d To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following
text in the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree To
temporarily stop delivery of Leadree for vacation breaks send: SET
Leadfree NOMAIL Search previous postings at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700
ext.5315
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------

------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------Leadfee
 Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree
To temporarily stop delivery of Leadree for vacation breaks send: SET
Leadfree NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask]
or
847-509-9700 ext.5315
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------

------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------Leadfee Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV
1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree
To temporarily stop delivery of Leadree for vacation breaks send: SET
Leadfree NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700
ext.5315
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tin Technology Ltd & ITRI Limited
Unit 3, Curo Park
Frogmore
St Albans
Hertfordshire, AL2 2DD

Phone number: +44 (0)870 458 4242
Fax number: +44 (0)870 458 4273
www.tintechnology.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This information given in this e-mail is for guidance only. It should be reproduced only in full, with no part taken out of context without prior permission. We believe the information provided in this statement and any attachments is reliable and useful, but it is furnished without warranty of any kind from the authors. 
Potential users should make their own determination of the suitability of any information provided and adopt any safety, health, and other precautions as may be deemed necessary by the user. 
No licence under any patent or other propriety rights is granted or to be inferred from the provision of the information herein. In no event will Tin Technology or any of its affiliates be liable for any damages whatsoever resulting from the use of or reliance upon this information.

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged and confidential information and if you are not an intended recipient you must not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. 
If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by telephone on +44 (0)870 458 4242. Please also destroy and delete the message from your computer.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leadfee Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree
To temporarily stop delivery of Leadree for vacation breaks send: SET Leadfree NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2