LEADFREE Archives

May 2004

Leadfree@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Haas, Bill" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
(Leadfree Electronics Assembly Forum)
Date:
Wed, 5 May 2004 13:23:53 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
Colleagues,

Recently our material science lab evaluated 0402 surface mount lead-free
resistors from 10 major world resistor suppliers.  The specimens were
dissolved in aquaregia (3:1 hydrochloric:nitric acid) and the extract
examined using inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy.  6 of the 10
samples showed lead concentrations greater than 1000 ppm.  The explanation
from resistor suppliers is that the lead comes from the lead oxide resistive
element and not from the terminations, which is probably true.  But they
further state that this usage is in accordance with RoHS legislation.  Would
any readers here be able to explain what RoHS Annex exemption applies to the
resistive elements of common resistors?

Thanks and regards,

Bill Haas

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leadfee Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree
To temporarily stop delivery of Leadree for vacation breaks send: SET Leadfree NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2