TECHNET Archives

April 2004

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Fri, 9 Apr 2004 08:43:56 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (74 lines)
Steve -

On issue also is that by processing the PCB through the soldermask
development chemistry, a slight affect is seen on the tin/lead which
creates an oxide layer.  This layer does reduce the solderability of the
board and also the shelf life of the parts.  This condition also will
have higher ionic contamination levels in your products being delivered.
The users must understand the photoimagble soldermask are not compatible
with a tin/lead conductive pattern.



Jeffrey Bush
Director, Quality Assurance and Technical Support

                          76 Technology Drive - POB 1890
                             Brattleboro, Vermont 05302-1890
                                Tel. 802.257.4571.21 Fax. 802.257.0011
                                    [log in to unmask]
                              http://www.vtcircuits.com	



-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Gregory [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2004 9:52 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Solder Mask over Tin/Lead...


Had a really frustrating conference call today. Our customer is standing
firm that they will not change their drawings on their fabs that specify
that everything needs to be coated with tin/lead before solder mask.

Their arguement is that they've never had any problems before, so why
should they change anything...and I percieved that they blamed our
assembly processes for the mask adhesion issues that we were seeing.

What do you do in a situation like this? I'm trying to gather as much
information as I can that shows that anything other than SMOBC is risky,
but during the conference call, anything that I tried to say was
dismissed...because they say that they've been doing this for years, and
this is the first time that they have heard from any of their
subcontractors that there is a problem.

I suppose that there won't be any good answers for this, we'll have to
deal with this the best that we can. Sure makes life interesting...the
customer is always right, and we're all about customer satisfaction.

-Steve Gregory-

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e To
unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or
(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET
Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the
posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the
archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please
visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for
additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2