DESIGNERCOUNCIL Archives

April 2004

DesignerCouncil@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
DesignerCouncil <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
Designers Council Forum <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Date:
Mon, 26 Apr 2004 13:32:51 -0500
Reply-To:
"(Designers Council Forum)" <[log in to unmask]>, "Kowalewski, Andy" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From:
"Kowalewski, Andy" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (148 lines)
Usually, you specify a trace width as "---- +/- x mils". The reason for
that is that overetching is usually consistent by around 0.5 to 1 mil
irrespective of trace width. As a result, the percentage of trace width
tolerance gets worse as traces become thinner.

Unfortunately, that's a fact of life, and is the reason it's very hard
to get reasonable impedance tolerances on thin traces.


Andy K.
Sychip Inc
Office (972) 202 8852

-----Original Message-----
From: DesignerCouncil [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
[log in to unmask]
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2004 1:05 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [DC] Etching Plating tolerance specs...

It's a great question, Kelly.

Seems like every way I've seen it, it's open to interpretation. Does a
plane area still have a "trace width"?

If the drawing says +/- 10%, does that mean the fabricator takes 10% of
the
smallest trace on the board and uses that number everywhere? Or does it
apply to each width?

Better yet, I've seen it as a trace/space tolerance. If a minimum trace
is
routed at minimum space anywhere, any deviation is a violation of one or
the other.

I know, I know... That really just didn't help at all....




                       "Dack.Kelly"
                       <[log in to unmask]>              To:
[log in to unmask]
                       Sent by: DesignerCouncil          cc:
                       <[log in to unmask]>         Subject:
[DC] Etching Plating
                                                           tolerance
specs...
                       04/26/2004 12:58 PM
                       Please respond to
                       "(Designers Council
                       Forum)"; Please respond to
                       "Dack.Kelly"







Greetings,

An inconsistency in our fab specs regarding etching/plating tolerance
finds
me at a mental "cross-roads" regarding this subject.

The spec for some of our designs express the tolerance in the form of
"mils"
--  +/-.001, while other spec express the tolerance in the form of a
percentage -- +/-10%.

In one sense, on a design w/ .010 nominal lines and spacing, these two
specs
are the same. However, on a design w/ .005/.005 or .004/.004 lines and
spacing, using a tolerancing method of +/-.001 vs. 10% has drastically
different results.

I would like to see any feedback on the pro's and con's of each method.
What
method do you use and why?

-- Kelly

Kelly Dack
PCB Dsnr
IGT (International Game Technology)
Reno, NV

------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------

DesignerCouncil Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using
LISTSERV
1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF DesignerCouncil.
To set a vacation stop for delivery of DesignerCouncil send: SET
DesignerCouncil NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases
>
E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask]
or
847-509-9700 ext.5315
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------




"This e-mail message is intended only for the use of the intended
recipient(s).
The information contained therein may be confidential or privileged, and
its disclosure or reproduction is strictly prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please return it immediately to
its
sender at the above address and destroy it."

------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------
DesignerCouncil Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using
LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF DesignerCouncil.
To set a vacation stop for delivery of DesignerCouncil send: SET
DesignerCouncil NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases
> E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700
ext.5315
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DesignerCouncil Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF DesignerCouncil.
To set a vacation stop for delivery of DesignerCouncil send: SET DesignerCouncil NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2