Excellent ideas we have not thought of. We will investigate them. Thank you
very much.
-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of [log in to unmask]
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 11:58 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Have you seen this before?
Several ideas come to mind when you describe your problem.
1. Dendritic growth- if you don't see them on the surface, you might have
them growing from hole to hole (providing you have vias or pth on your PWB)
within the laminate matrix along the reinforcing fiber bundles. Classic work
on the
within the laminate version of this done by Raytheon and reported by A.
derMaaderosian. (One of the other respondents also proposed this as a
possible
cause.)
2. Non-ionic materials that attract water- some of the PWB fab chemicals
will
do this, yet offer no response to ionic test instruments such as the
Ionograph or OmegaMeter. Cheap test for this are the TM 650 test methods
2.3.38 7
2.3.39
Another test would be to bake for several days in vacuum oven, then test the
PWA under very low humidy conditions. If works ok, try letting it
equilibrate
at higher humidity conditions- 70% would be good. If it then croaks, dry it
out again and test at very low humidity conditions. If performance is
restored,
then you have a moisture/current leakage problem. Honeywell Space folks
determined that 4 monolayers of water was enough to generate a current
leakage path
when adsorbed onto PWA surfaces with residual organics to hold it.
Last, you don't need dendrites to get current leakage. In a previous life,
built an automated current leakage detection timing unit for testing
purposes.
The timer auto- started upon detection of 4 microamps of current leakage,
shut
off the digital timer when reaching 500 microamps of current leakage.
Dramatic
contrast between solvent and aqueous processes, but the real point was of
all
the measurements that reached the current leakage limit of 500 microamps,
only about 42% actually developed dendrites, the majority were just
invisible
current leakage paths on the surface. The test boards had three comb
patterns,
but no holes in them, so these were all surface current leakage measurements
without any complications from within the FR4 laminate.
This may give you some ideas for closing in on your problem. Anyone else
wish
to comment?
Bill Kenyon
Global Centre Consulting
3336 Birmingham Drive
Fort Collins, CO 80526
Tel: 970.207.9586 Cell: 302.377.4272
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------
|
