TECHNET Archives

March 2004

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:51:29 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (70 lines)
------ Forwarded Message
> From: Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:48:07 +0000
> To: 5-32b Task Group <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: [SIRNET] Process Qual Question Round 2
>
> Oooh! Me SIR, pick me SIR (waving hand frantically in the air....)
>
> 1   Mixed technology, because that is what most of our High Rel customers
> do.... And it would be unfair to discriminate against them
>
> 2   Please SIR, may have a little more time, I know my project is late, but I
> trying to catch up.
>
> 3   Our vehicle / coupon employs both, but the user can decide which he
> prefers to employ. They don't have to fit CSP if they aren't using them, but
> the test site is present if they do.
>
> 4   The wheel SIR.
>
> Can I have my grade before the week-end please SIR?
>
> Graham Naisbitt
>
>> OK class, time for your next assignment.
>>
>> Again, the topic is "qualifying" a manufacturing process, either in house
>> or from a supplier.  Steve Gregory has been kind enough to post a picture
>> for me
>>
>> http://www.stevezeva.homestead.com and look for "IEC Coupon".
>>
>> This is a coupon that has been proposed in the IEC specification that
>> Graham Naisbitt is working on.  There is some re-design efforts going on
>> currently.  One such effort is to add through holes for a connector or pin
>> field.  As you can see from the picture, the current board is purely
>> surface mount.
>>
>> So, your assigment, in essay form, is to answer the following three
>> questions:
>>
>> 1.    As a process qualification vehicle, should the vehicle be pure
>> surface mount, or mixed technology (both SMT and PTH), and why?
>>
>> 2.    What would you add or subtract from the test board to make it more
>> useful to you?
>>
>> 3.    Should there be two offerings of qualification vehicles, "cutting
>> edge" vs. "mainstream"?  Cutting edge would incorporate fine pitch, flip
>> chips, CSPs, etc., where the mainstream board would not.
>>
>> 4.    Extra Credit question:  What was the greatest thing "before" sliced
>> bread?
>>
>> Doug Pauls
>> Rockwell Collins
>>

------ End of Forwarded Message

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2