TECHNET Archives

March 2004

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Douthit <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Tue, 9 Mar 2004 10:29:55 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (270 lines)
Ramon,

You might be amazed at what cleaning crews use on the interior and
exterior of aircraft.

David A. Douthit
Manager
LoCan LLC

Dehoyos, Ramon wrote:

>        Thanks for the correction.
>        Ramon
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Crepeau, Phil (Space Technology)
>>Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 10:44 AM
>>To:   Dehoyos, Ramon
>>Subject:      RE: [TN] FW: [TN] Pros and Cons on Type UR vice Type AR
>>
>>
>Conformal Coating
>
>
>>i think you meant type ar not ur.
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Dehoyos, Ramon (NG)
>>Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 6:08 AM
>>To: [log in to unmask]
>>Subject: [TN] FW: [TN] Pros and Cons on Type UR vice Type AR Conformal
>>Coating
>>
>>
>>        One of the disadvantages of UR coating is that it will not
>>
>>
>withstand
>
>
>>solvents. Besides  boards in  aircrafts that might be closed to the fuel
>>tank or in automobile  engine compartments, most boards are not in
>>
>>
>proximity
>
>
>>to fuels, acetone or alcohol. So UR is plenty good. It saves a lot of
>>
>>
>boards
>
>
>>from being damaged during rework due to the simplicity of removal.
>>        Regards,
>>        Ramon
>>
>>
>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Dehoyos, Ramon
>>>Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 8:15 AM
>>>To:   [log in to unmask]
>>>Subject:      Re: [TN] Pros and Cons on Type UR vice Type AR Conformal
>>>
>>>
>>Coating
>>
>>
>>>        One thing to know is that AR can be coated to patch UR but not
>>>
>>>
>the
>
>
>>>other way around. Patching AR with UR creates a mix that takes too long
>>>
>>>
>to
>
>
>>>dry, stays soft. So to switch from UR to AR is recommended.
>>>        Regards,
>>>        Ramon
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: - Bogert [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
>>>>Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 4:55 PM
>>>>To:
>>>>Subject:      [TN] Pros and Cons on Type UR vice Type AR Conformal
>>>>
>>>>
>>Coating
>>
>>
>>>>As a Class 3 customer we are considering mandating transition from
>>>>
>>>>
>Type
>
>
>>UR
>>
>>
>>>to Type AR conformal coating, to make it easier to replace failed
>>>components.  Are there any Class 3 users of Type AR coating?  What is
>>>
>>>
>>track
>>
>>
>>>record for using Type AR?  Are there any compatibility issues with
>>>
>>>
>certain
>
>
>>>types of solder masks?  Any input you have would help.  Another
>>>
>>>
>advantage
>
>
>>>with AR would be for returned equipment.  The OEM could remove all the
>>>coating from an assembly using alcohol, then perform
>>>
>>>
>>>>---------------------------------------------------
>>>>Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
>>>>To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
>>>>
>>>>
>>in
>>
>>
>>>>the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
>>>>To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
>>>>
>>>>
>>>[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
>>>
>>>
>>>>To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
>>>>
>>>>
>>>[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
>>>
>>>
>>>>Search the archives of previous posts at:
>>>>
>>>>
>>http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
>>
>>
>>>>Please visit IPC web site
>>>>
>>>>
>>http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
>>
>>
>>>for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask]
>>>
>>>
>or
>
>
>>>847-509-9700 ext.5315
>>>
>>>
>>>>-----------------------------------------------------
>>>>bed-of-nails testing to quickly identify failed components.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>---------------------------------------------------
>>>Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
>>>To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
>>>
>>>
>in
>
>
>>>the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
>>>To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
>>>
>>>
>>[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
>>
>>
>>>To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
>>>
>>>
>>[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
>>
>>
>>>Search the archives of previous posts at:
>>>
>>>
>http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
>
>
>>>Please visit IPC web site
>>>
>>>
>http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
>
>
>>for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
>>847-509-9700 ext.5315
>>
>>
>>>-----------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>---------------------------------------------------
>>Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e>
>>To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
>>the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
>>To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
>>
>>
>[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
>
>
>>To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
>>
>>
>[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
>
>
>>Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
>>Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
>>
>>
>for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
>847-509-9700 ext.5315
>
>
>>-----------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>
>---------------------------------------------------
>Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
>To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
>the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
>To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
>To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
>Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
>Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
>-----------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>


---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2