Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 11 Mar 2004 19:57:54 -0500 |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
X-To: |
|
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Thanks for the valuable input.
Please note that the last thing I want is to give microVIP a bad name.
Therefore I have to clarify that my original questions apply to 0.010" vias,
mainly on 0.050"x0.040" pads.
Best regards,
Ioan
-----Original Message-----
From: Macko, Joe @ IEC
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: 3/11/2004 6:51 PM
Subject: Re: [TN] Reliability of via in pad
Gary,
Good points. Can you refer me to any studies that associate VIP design
vs.
"unacceptable" voiding? A little voiding may be good for reliability
but
too much is not good. I struggle with determining how large or deep a
VIP
can be before it contributes or causes unacceptable voiding.
joe
-----Original Message-----
From: Gary Ferrari [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 2:20 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Reliability of via in pad
Technetters,
Please let us not throw the baby out with the bath water. I would hate
for
VIP technology to get a bad name when in essence your valid concerns are
associated with larger vias than used in HDI technology. A similar panic
was
created
against dry film soldermasks because the commonly used dry film mask
thicknesses were around 0.006 in. When mask manufacturers introduced
high
conformance
thin masks (0.001 - 0.002 in) to address the needs of SMT , everyone
shunned
them because they were "dry film", when in reality their gripes were
with
the
thicker cousins.
Regards,
Gary
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask]
or
847-509-9700 ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700
ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------
|
|
|