TECHNET Archives

February 2004

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Kathy Kuhlow <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Wed, 4 Feb 2004 15:54:33 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
Could you use the J-STD-001 for the cleanliness portion.  Can you make your suppliers certify that the cleaning process for both the automated process flux removal and the manual operations can maintain the ionic residues per the standard?  You can then have them supply the rational of how they comply and audit that process and the records that have resulted from the monitoring of the process?  
Was the rework to components that have little or no stand off of the PCB?  If so they should have formulated the process on how they would handle those parts. Were the products hand washed or machine washed?  Maybe you can make some rules for hand soldering in general in which you can specify ionic removal, verification, and determine a common standard by which to judge the products.  

Kat

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2