TECHNET Archives

February 2004

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Wed, 11 Feb 2004 16:51:49 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (353 lines)
You mean WMD stand for water, mostly deionised?
:-)

Brian

Douglas O. Pauls wrote:

> One would HOPE that the toast is lead-free.  I might have concerns about MY
> long term reliability othewise.
>
> I agree with what you say, but the term "verifiable objective evidence" is
> such a wonderfully vague term.  You and I could probably trade war stories
> for a few days on the scant data that passes for "objective evidence".
>
> Doug Pauls
>
>
>
>
>                       "Whittaker, Dewey
>                       (AZ75)"                     To:       [log in to unmask]
>                       <Dewey.Whittaker@HON        cc:
>                       EYWELL.COM>                 Subject:  Re: [TN] Contamination on a SOT-23 component
>                       Sent by: TechNet
>                       <[log in to unmask]>
>
>
>                       02/11/2004 08:03 AM
>                       Please respond to
>                       "TechNet E-Mail
>                       Forum."; Please
>                       respond to
>                       "Whittaker, Dewey
>                       (AZ75)"
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Doug,
> And if that toast is a multigrain construction in the Lead-Free forum,you
> could have long term reliability concerns.
> Some of the criteria we have for high reliability assemblies in a
> potentially No-Clean(or low residue) soldering process is clean and
> solderable parts/PWBs.Verifiable objective evidence of meeting these
> requirements must be maintained and made available upon request.
> Dewey
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Douglas O. Pauls [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
>>Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 6:33 AM
>>To:   [log in to unmask]
>>Subject:      Re: [TN] Contamination on a SOT-23 component
>>
>>Good morning Daan,
>>
>>Where did you ever get that idea?  Must have been one of those mornings
>>before I had my Diet Dew(s).
>>
>>Residues on components or bare boards is always an issue.  If the residue
>>on either is a purely surface residue, then it is less of a concern if
>>they
>>are going into a no-clean assembly operation.  It is more of a concern,
>
> or
>
>>critical, in no-clean assembly because you have no way of addressing
>
> those
>
>>residues.
>>
>>If the components or boards have absorbed residues, you are toast.  You
>>"might" be able to do rescue cleaning in mild cases, but most often not.
>>The laws of physics are not subject to repeal or negotiation.
>>
>>Doug Pauls
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>                      "d. terstegge"
>>
>>                      <[log in to unmask]        To:
>>[log in to unmask]
>>
>>                      SGROUP.COM>                     cc:
>>
>>                      Sent by: TechNet                Subject:  Re: [TN]
>>Contamination on a SOT-23 component
>>                      <[log in to unmask]>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>                      02/11/2004 03:16 AM
>>
>>                      Please respond to
>>
>>                      "TechNet E-Mail Forum.";
>>
>>                      Please respond to "d.
>>
>>                      terstegge"
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Hi Brian,
>>
>>I understood from earlier posting of you and others that the lack of
>>cleanliness of incoming components is considered a risk ONLY for
>>no-clean technology.  Now Cheryl obviously has a problem with
>>contaminated parts in a process that does include cleaning. This makes
>>me wonder how (in general) the chances are that a cleaning process
>>designed mainly for cleaning flux residues from pcb assemblies will
>>clean the variety of contaminants present on incoming parts. Perhaps you
>>can comment on this ?
>>
>>Daan Terstegge
>>Thales Communications
>>Unclassified mail
>>Personal Website: http://www.smtinfo.net
>>
>>
>>>>>[log in to unmask] 02/11/04 08:56am >>>
>>
>>Amen! Lord Doug has hit it on the head.
>>
>>It may interest you (academically) to know that the erstwhile company
>>I
>>owned manufactured the Microcontaminometer 20 years ago, through to
>>1991. It was capable of measuring the ionic contamination on parts as
>>small as a single diode. It was not a popular instrument: I think we
>>probably sold less than 50 of the beasts. What we did find was that
>>many
>>components were hopelessly badly contaminated. There is a whole
>>chapter
>>in my book on this subject, with photos. One IC, which is shown,
>>measured at 12.4 µg/cm2 eq. NaCl and this is by no means exceptional.
>>
>>My experience in my former professional life was that component
>>manufacturers cared even less about cleanliness than they did about
>>solderability and I know no reason why this state of affairs should be
>>any different today.
>>
>>Brian
>>
>>Cheryl Tulkoff wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I've been working on a tough but challenging contamination problem.
>>
>>The
>>
>>>contamination causes electrical leakage fails on a precision test
>>>instrument. Ion chromatography analysis points to an incoming
>>
>>cleanliness
>>
>>>problem on a SOT-23 component. Elevated choride and sulfate levels
>>
>>were
>>
>>>found on the components (5x - 10x greater ug/in2 levels than
>>
>>anything
>>
>>>found elsewhere on the boards). High levels were found even on our
>>
>>"good"
>>
>>>boards.
>>>
>>>We are trying to work with our supplier to identify and fix the
>>
>>problem
>>
>>>long term but are looking for some short term fixes as well.
>>
>>Repeated
>>
>>>water washing of the boards (high pressure spray cleaning) improves
>>
>>the
>>
>>>situation but does not fix it. Alcohol scrubs in the area further
>>
>>improve
>>
>>>it but don't eliminate the problem entirely.
>>>
>>>We have a only a DI water wash process (no surfactant/saponifier
>>>capability).Does anyone have any board or component cleaning
>>>recommendations?
>>>
>>>Are there any parts makers out there willing to tell me a little
>>
>>more
>>
>>>about parts cleaning after the lead plating process?
>>>
>>>What tool(s) do part makers use to verify cleanliness of parts?
>>>
>>>I don't have a tool capable of measuring what was found on the part
>>
>>so I
>>
>>>don't know where to go.
>>>
>>>Thanks, Cheryl Tulkoff
>>>
>>>---------------------------------------------------
>>>Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
>>>To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following
>>
>>text in
>>
>>>the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
>>>To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
>>
>>[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
>>
>>>To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
>>
>>[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
>>
>>>Search the archives of previous posts at:
>>
>>http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
>>
>>>Please visit IPC web site
>>
>>http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
>>information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700
>>ext.5315
>>
>>>-----------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>
>>---------------------------------------------------
>>Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
>>To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
>>in
>>the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
>>To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
>>[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (M
>>AIL)
>>To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
>>[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
>>Search the archives of previous posts at:
>>http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
>>Please visit IPC web site
>>http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
>>information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700
>>ext.5315
>>-----------------------------------------------------
>>
>>---------------------------------------------------
>>Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
>>To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
>>the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
>>To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
>>[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
>>To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
>>[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
>>Search the archives of previous posts at:
>
> http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
>
>>Please visit IPC web site
>
> http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
>
>>for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask]
>
> or
>
>>847-509-9700 ext.5315
>>-----------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>---------------------------------------------------
>>Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
>>To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
>>the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
>>To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
>>[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
>>To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
>>[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
>>Search the archives of previous posts at:
>
> http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
>
>>Please visit IPC web site
>
> http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
>
>>for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask]
>
> or
>
>>847-509-9700 ext.5315
>>-----------------------------------------------------
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
> To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
> Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
> Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
> for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
> 847-509-9700 ext.5315
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
> To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
> Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
> Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2