TECHNET Archives

January 2004

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mike McMonagle <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:09:20 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (71 lines)
Connie,
        Are there any other locations in the circuit away from the lead
where this part could be tapped in? Or possibly it must be there at the
pin for other reasons? If it has to be there, this would be considered
as a jumper wire as outlined in 11.2.5.2, which makes no mention of
solder touching the body. Though not good standard practice, many rework
scenarios are unique to an assembly and do not fall under 'cookie
cutter' assembly techniques. Explain to your customer the issue this
particular rework raises in regards to workmanship standards, gain their
understanding and approval, and move forward.

Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Connie Korth
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 12:04 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] IPC 610 Interpretation


        Good afternoon all,

        We have a rework situation in our facility.  Here goes:

        We have a gull wing component that we have to add a large
through-hole capacitor lead on to one of the IC leads.  Per the 610
requirement, 12.2.5.5, solder may not touch the body of the component of
a gull wing component.  Because this is not a normal build situation, is
that a requirement that has to be met?  It is very difficult to solder
this large lead on to this small lead, making a solid connection,
without getting solder between the lead and body of the IC.  I realize
the 610 is a guideline for us to make decisions.

        So.........  In your opinion, what would you do?  Rework, accept
as is, .....
        I realize the final decision is between us and our customer, but
would
like    to hear what others think aobut this.


        Thanks,

        Connie M. Korth
        Quality Specialist
        Reptron Mfg. Services
        [log in to unmask]
        218-262-8209

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e To
unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or
(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET
Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the
posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the
archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please
visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for
additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2