TECHNET Archives

January 2004

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Lum Wee Mei <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Thu, 29 Jan 2004 12:35:46 +0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (67 lines)
Steve,

You are not being paranoid. I will say the same thing.

We just cannot leave it to chance that whatever impurity that is left
behind will stay begnin and inactive throughout the product life cycle.

Jsut my 0.1cent contribution.

Regards,
Wee Mei

Steve Gregory wrote:

>Hi Joe!
>
>This topic has come up before, and there has been inputs from Brian Ellis,
>and Doug Pauls on this issue...if I remember correctly, it's not a good idea. If
>I'm wrong, please correct me.
>
>Thinking about the big picture, I have my own thoughts. Once an assembly is
>coated, you have effectively sealed everything that's on the board in beneath
>the coating.
>
>If the bare board came in absolutely clean, and everybody wore gloves when
>handling the fabs so as to not contaminate the board with skin salts, all the
>flux was activated from reflow or wave, and no touch-up was done on the
>assembly...then maybe, just maybe, I might say it's okay.
>
>If an assembly needs coating because of the environment it will be in, I just
>think it's best to clean it as well as possible to remove everything and then
>coat it. I may be paranoid, but that's just me...
>
>-Steve Gregory-
>
>
>Fellow Techeads,
>
>It has been suggested by one of our CMs that it is acceptable to conformal
>coat (type AR) over no clean flux residue.  Would anyone like to share their
>opinions or experience on this subject.  Conformal coating over residue does
>not sound like the correct thing to do.  thanks
>
>joe
>
>---------------------------------------------------
>Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
>To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
>the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
>To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
>To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
>Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
>Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
>-----------------------------------------------------
>
>

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2