Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | TechNet E-Mail Forum. |
Date: | Wed, 3 Dec 2003 21:33:40 +0100 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I agree with Bev....
Avoid rework as a standard process in the manufacturing line...
Reliability of the finished product might not the be the main issue but
consider the costs of such process definition (lead-time vs. capital
costs, resources vs. added value to a product and so on)
What I mean is that if the process is not demanded in some way from your
customer and don't add value to a product, the process itself is
excessive.
And Yes! The process control is the key word in this relation.
If you have a process control that gives you early alarms, reduction of
the rework is a direct consequence... But to come there, process
requirements needs to be satisfied....
Anyhow, the goal is fast and reliable production to reasonable costs and
quality and the only honest way to get good customers if you are in the
contract manufacturing branch.
Rework itself is invented for two reasons... Either to cover up a lack of
quality or to make money.... I would always choose the second alternative.
:)
Good luck,
Sasha
*************************************************************************
Sasha Miladinovic - Production Engineering
Amersham Biosciences, PCB Production, Umeå
Tel: +46 (0) 90 150 232
Fax: +46 (0) 90 138 372
E-mail: [log in to unmask]
*************************************************************************
John Parsons <[log in to unmask]>
Sent by: TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
2003-12-03 20:51
Please respond to "TechNet E-Mail Forum."; Please respond to John Parsons
To: [log in to unmask]
cc:
Subject: [TN] Touchup - We don't need no stinkin' touchup! Or do we?
Greetings all,
I have moved on from my old life in the fabrication business to learn some
new things in the contract manufacturing sector. My first question to the
group in this new role is on the subject of touch-up as a standard process
step after smt placement and reflow. Does everyone do this or can it be
eliminated by process control during placement and reflow? I personally
don't much care for non-value added processes but was just wondering what
the general feeling out there was.
Regards
John Parsons
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask]
or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------
|
|
|