Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | TechNet E-Mail Forum. |
Date: | Mon, 3 Nov 2003 16:04:13 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Lifted land/pad criteria is covered in IPC-A-610C Clause 10.7.2 starting
on page 10-18. While the illustrations show lands associated with
through-hole leads, Clause 1.2 is very specific that words take
precedence over the illustrations and there are no words in 10.7.2 that
restrict this criteria to through-hole lands. This applies to via or
test probe lands as well as through-hole termination lands.
1.4.3.5 is not clear as to it's meaning and is often taken out of
context. When IPC-HDBK-610 was developed statements of interpretation of
1.4.3.5 were added as follows:
This statement has two meanings.
* When no criteria for a specific condition is provided in this
Standard, nonconformance needs to be determined by the supplier and may
require agreement with the end user; see 1.3 for additional information.
* When the Standard states a specific acceptable criterion but does not
provide a corresponding defect criterion, nonconformance needs to be
determined by the supplier and may require agreement with the end user.
Revision D of 610 (still in development) has a little wordsmithing on
the statement to change the "are acceptable" to "may be acceptable" to
reinforce that a decision has to be made: "Conditions that are not
specified as defective or as a process indicator may be considered
acceptable unless it can be established that the condition affects end
user defined form, fit, function, or reliability."
Jack Crawford
Director, Certification and Assembly Technology
[log in to unmask]
847-790-5393
fax 847-504-2393
-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce D Stilmack [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 10:13 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Lands on via's
Could anyone provide an interpretation of the requirements regarding the
pads or lands on via's? Presently I have some that are missing, but
there
is no trace connections at these points. The pads were used as Test
points
during GENRAD testing. Does anyone feel this is a defect or can it be
discounted using para 1.4.3.5 as a condition not specified?
Bruce Stilmack
GDLS-TO Manufacturing Engineer
(850) 574-4773
[log in to unmask]
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700
ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------
|
|
|