TECHNET Archives

November 2003

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Hoover <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
David Hoover <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 19 Nov 2003 20:42:11 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (200 lines)
John ,   (and Chris)

I'm not sure what that combination would be called but I'm sure if
you use a 2D Field Solver you could create a template that replicates
the PCB environment and would allow you to run analysis to model
the characteristic impedance.

I've seen where some microwave folks call a single layer with a signal
between two ground shields "suspended stripline" an "co-planar".
I believe TX line has the co-planar waveguide as one of it's options.

try:  http://www.appwave.com/products/txline.html

But I honestly don't think they have the reference to only one side
as an option.

Good Luck,

-David Hoover

http://home.earthlink.net/~dhoovy
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Parsons" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 12:59 PM
Subject: Re: [TN] Co-planar Impedance Calculations


> Chris,
>
> The board is double sided, not multilayer and from what I gather the other
> layer will simply be another signal layer - trace direction unknown at
this
> time.
>
> Thanks for your input.
> Anyone else?
>
> John
>   -----Original Message-----
>   From: Chris Robertson [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>   Sent: November 19, 2003 12:38 PM
>   To: TechNet E-Mail Forum.; John Parsons
>   Subject: Re: [TN] Co-planar Impedance Calculations
>
>
>   What is the next layer? Signal? or is it a layer covered only by
> dielectric.
>   I would guess it is next to another signal layer that is of alternate
> direction.
>   Something like a coupled stripline?
>   If you don't plan on going that route then your working on something I
> wondered about.
>   Can you treat a trace as an embedded microstrip....? I wonder.
>   Sorry that is now out of my league, but I'm very interested in hearing
> what you find.
>
>   Chris Robertson
>   [log in to unmask]
>     ----- Original Message -----
>     From: John Parsons
>     To: [log in to unmask]
>     Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 2:07 PM
>     Subject: Re: [TN] Co-planar Impedance Calculations
>
>
>     Chris,
>
>     I hear what you are saying, and yes, I used the word "ground" out of
> habit.
>     My confusion though lies in the fact that there will be no reference
> plane
>     below the signal trace (hence coplanar) and that the designer seems to
> think
>     that they (end user) only want the reference line on one side of the
> signal
>     line.
>
>     When I try and use the Polar calculator with the parameters given
below,
> and
>     I deselect the "plane" radio buttons it tells me that I need a
reference
>     line width of at least 10x the dielectric thickness, which is 62mil)
or
> 10x
>     the coplanar separation.
>
>     Again, to clarify, my confusion is in the fact that I do not have
> reference
>     "plane" surrounding the signal trace.  I need to understand how the
> proposed
>     design will work, and how to reconcile the calculations before
>     manufacturing.
>
>     Thanks
>     John
>       -----Original Message-----
>       From: Chris Robertson [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>       Sent: November 19, 2003 11:48 AM
>       To: TechNet E-Mail Forum.; John Parsons
>       Subject: Re: [TN] Co-planar Impedance Calculations
>
>
>       It doesn't have to be ground. That is why they are always called
> reference
>     planes.
>       I personally use + and - voltages with no problems. I also have used
> split
>     planes
>       above and below, but I also recommend not to use split plane
reference
>     planes in
>       the areas where controlled impedance traces are or on very high
>     frequencies.
>       This is just my personal findings.
>       I like the polar calculator and actually compared my calculator on
> their
>     findings.
>       Go to www.pcbdr.com and get the spread sheet calculator. or directly
> to
>       http://home.hiwaay.net/~robdne/files/Beta%20ResourceV4.xls to use
the
>       calculator online. (click on the "stack" tab at the bottom)
>       The updated version is much better. These calculate the entire board
> and
>       adds the thickness on the fly.
>
>       Chris Robertson
>       Author "PCB Designer's Reference"
>       [log in to unmask]
>       ISBN: 0130674818
>       Search for it at www.Amazon.com
>
>         ----- Original Message -----
>         From: John Parsons
>         To: [log in to unmask]
>         Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 1:14 PM
>         Subject: [TN] Co-planar Impedance Calculations
>
>
>         Greetings all,
>
>         I have a customer who is doing an impedance design for Intel and
he
> has
>     no
>         previous impedance experience.  This is the information I have.
>
>         - double sided board
>         - target impedance 50ohm
>         - signal line 5mil wide, spaced 5mil from "ground" trace and this
> pair
>     of
>         traces should be spaced a minimum of 20mil from adjacent traces.
>
>         This is what he was given from Intel.  I am using an older Polar
> model
>         (CITS25 calculator) which does have models for co-planar designs
but
>     from
>         what I can tell they assume that the signal trace is sandwiched
> between
>         ground (return lines) on both sides.  Is this a correct
> interpretation?
>     Is
>         it possible to model the design as described above?
>
>         While we have some experience with controlled impedance I have no
>     experience
>         with the aforementioned design and could use some assistance.
>
>         Best Regards
>         John Parsons
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
> To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
> Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
> Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5315
> -----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2