TECHNET Archives

October 2003

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Lum Wee Mei <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Thu, 2 Oct 2003 10:23:55 +0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
Hello,

It's me again, the curious cat. I have more questions on BGA :

1. IPC-7095 states that when the balls goes through reflow, it will be
reduced by 0.25mm to 0.3mm. As a newcomer to this field, I think this
value is quite reasonable and acceptable for ball diameter greater than
0.5mm. However, I cannot quite accept this value for ball diameter in
the range of 0.3 to 0.4mm? Won't we find the package almost flat to the
board after reflow?

2. Is there a lsit of standoff height values available after reflow as
part of the assembly acceptable criteria. Are we not at our assembler's
mercy, to find BGAs mounted almost flat onto the board but cannot reject
just because the X-ray does not show shorts between balls?

Hope to hear from you soon.

Regards,
Wee Mei

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2