TECHNET Archives

October 2003

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Dehoyos, Ramon" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Thu, 2 Oct 2003 05:44:56 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (117 lines)
        Some extracts of the article pointed out by Steve are below. Thicker
is better as far as joint fatigue, which makes sense. Copper is not as
flexible as solder.
        Ramon
> Information on how the ramp time, hold time, frequency, and temperature
> affect the fatigue life of solder joints has been studied and published
> [Vayman]. However, information on how the height of the solder joints
> affects the fatigue life of surface mount solder joints is not readily
> available.
> This solder joint fatigue problem presented an interesting question.
> Should the solder joints be reworked to increase solder joint thickness
> and lengthen the fatigue life? Several engineers had conflicting points of
> view on how the height of the solder would affect the fatigue life.
> The NASA hand soldering requirements in NHB5300.4 (3A-2) indicate that,
> for lapped solder joints, the maximum distance between the foot of the
> lead and the termination is .010 inch.
> Solving for Stress and Strain Values. The finite element analysis code,
> ABAQUS, was used to solve the mathematical model of the SOT23 package. The
> results of the analysis are depicted in Table 1 and Figure 2. FEA showed
> that increasing the thickness of the solder joint did not affect the
> overall stress values on the SOT23 package as a whole. However, it did
> show that the strain values on the solder joint were affected by changing
> the thickness of the solder.
> FEA showed that increasing the solder joint height may have a favorable
> effect on the solder joint's fatigue life. As a direct result of
> increasing the thickness of the solder joint, the plastic strain in the
> solder was reduced. The fatigue life of the solder joint doubled from 28.5
> cycles at 2 mils to 59.2 at 10 mils. Our results show that below 4 mils,
> the solder joint was subject to cyclic failure much sooner. After 4 mils,
> the number of cycles increased with thickness, but not as drastically as
> it did from 2 to 4 mils. This is evident in Figure 3.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Gregory [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 4:56 PM
> To:   [log in to unmask]
> Subject:      Re: [TN] Reliability solder
>
> Hi Paul!
>
> To answer your question; Is water wet? Does a bear poop in the woods?
> (GRIN)
>
> After careful consideration, one would have to answer in the affirmative
> to both scenarios posed above. So the short answer to your query is;
> "uh-huh"...go to:
>
> http://nepp.nasa.gov/eeelinks/vol_01/no_02/eee1-2d.html
>
> Here you will find a summary of a report done by Hyun Soo Park of NASA,
> "Theoretical Analysis to Determine how Solder Joint Height Affects the
> Fatigue Life of the Solder Joint". It also has a list of references that
> include no other than our own Technetter guru; Werner Engelmaier, of all
> the work that's been done in this area.
>
> -Steve Gregory-
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>       Paul Stolar
>       Materials Engineer
>       Houston Technology Center
>       Baker Atlas
>       713-625-5376
>       713-625-4949 (fax)
>
>
>
>
>
>       Has anyone ever done any experiments to determine the effect the
> solder
>       thickness under a lead has on the joint's reliability?
>
>       Paul Stolar
>       Materials Engineer
>       Houston Technology Center
>       Baker Atlas
>       713-625-5376
>       713-625-4949 (fax)
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
> To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
> Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
> Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
> for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
> 847-509-9700 ext.5315
> -----------------------------------------------------
>

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2