TECHNET Archives

October 2003

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Fri, 24 Oct 2003 17:42:36 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (64 lines)
I agree. In addition on same assumption of reasonable workmanship, in
either size in a pull to destruction test, the failure mode is not
likely to be in the lead solder interface, [solder joint is likely to be
stronger than hole to board adhesion etc.] so its some what of a mute
point anyway.

Regards
Mike Fenner
Indium Corporation
T: + 44 1908 580 400
M: + 44 7810 526 317
F: + 44 1908 580 411
E: [log in to unmask]
W: www.indium.com
Pb-free: www.Pb-Free.com
-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Guy Ramsey
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 4:49 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Solder Joint Strength


The larger ring might be a little stronger, but most of the strength of
the area of the connection would be in the PTH. The area increase on the
ring would be quite small. I don't think soldering technique has much
effect, assuming good process results.
-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Steve Kelly
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 5:57 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Solder Joint Strength


I had a question from a customer today which I could not answer.
Question was " if a pin is soldered in a through hole with an annular
ring of .010 is this a stronger joint than if the annular ring was .005"
. Doesn't this depend more on the soldering technique that the size of
the ring? Thanks. Steve Kelly

PFC Flexible Circuits Limited
Ph: (416) 750-8433
Fax: (416) 750-0016
Cell: (416) 577-8433
E-Mail: [log in to unmask]
---

:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

This email, its content and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the addressee(s) and may be legally privileged and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient please delete and contact the sender by return and delete the material from any computer. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.

Messages sent via this medium may be subject to delays, non-delivery and unauthorized alteration. This email has been prepared using information believed by the author to be reliable and accurate, but Indium Corporation makes no warranty as to accuracy or completeness. In particular, Indium Corporation does not accept responsibility for changes made to this email after it was sent. Any opinions or recommendations expressed herein are solely those of the author. They may be subject to change without notice.

:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2