DESIGNERCOUNCIL Archives

October 2003

DesignerCouncil@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Lum Wee Mei <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
(Designers Council Forum)
Date:
Wed, 1 Oct 2003 15:57:53 +0800
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (2434 bytes)
Hello ,

With reference to those responsed to the 0.8mm BGA question, Leslie has
shared with us that 0.4mm pad can be used.

Taking reference to the table below (by the way, no one has responsed my
early message),  I would assume that it has ball diameter = 0.5mm as
0.8mm pitch BGA can have ball diameters from  0.3mm to 0.5mm.

I have come across Intel 1.0mm Easy BGA  with 0.43 nomimal ball
diameter, recommending 0.3mm pad. For a newcomer, based on the 20%
reduction recommeded in IPC-7095, the pad diameter would be 0.344mm as
the pitch is more than sufficient  to cater it. Why Intel uses 0.3mm and
not 0.344mm?

Anyone want to share a light?

Regards,
Wee Mei


Lum Wee Mei wrote:

> Hello there,
>
> I was working on some analysis work on BGA pad diameters and its
> correlation to other factors when I come across this Table 6 in
> IPC-7095. I cannot explain the differences found which I highlighted
> in bold.  The table specifies :
>
> Nominal ball szie    Reduction    Nominal Land Dia.     Land Variation
> 0.75                            25%                0.55 (27%)
>              0.60 - 0.50
> 0.60                            25%                0.45 (25%)
>             0.50 - 0.40
> 0.50                            20%                0.40 (20%)
>             0.45 - 0.35
> 0.45                            20%                0.35 (22%)
>             0.35 - 0.25
> 0.40                            20%                0.30 (25%)
>             0.35 - 0.20
> 0.30                            20%                0.25 (17%)
>             0.25 - 0.20
>
> Anyone care to shed a light on the difference in the two percentages
> or how the Nominal Land Dia. value come about or agreed upon. Your
> answers will be deeply appreciated.
>
> Regards,
> Wee Mei
>
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DesignerCouncil Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF DesignerCouncil.
To set a vacation stop for delivery of DesignerCouncil send: SET DesignerCouncil NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------


ATOM RSS1 RSS2