TECHNET Archives

August 2003

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Thu, 21 Aug 2003 16:14:26 +0300
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (83 lines)
Many a true word spoken in jest!

Brian

joyce wrote:
> Brian,
> My take is: it is time for ceramics...MCM with connectors mount on metal
> fixture with dielectric... Just (not really) kidding...
>
> jk
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
>>Brian Ellis
>>Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 7:15 AM
>>To: [log in to unmask]
>>Subject: [TN] WEEE/RoHS clarification required
>>
>>
>>I've just received the August IPC Review.
>>
>>On p. 6, there is an article, "Lead Time on Lead Free
>>Dwindles". This re-states the deadline of 1 July 2006 for
>>total lead-free soldering for products sold in Europe
>>(ignoring the few named exceptions).
>>
>>On p. 4, there is an article, "IPC Quells Flames of
>>Halogen-Free Issue", which claims, after study, that there is
>>no reason not to use halogenated flame retardants, such as TBBPA.
>>
>>It is my understanding that the same EU directives require all
>>laminates and plastics in electronics assemblies to use
>>non-halogenated flame retardants, presumably from the same
>>date (I have not checked this in the actual directives).
>>
>>Does this not reveal an extremely dichotomous polity on the
>>part of the IPC? On the one hand, the IPC has gone
>>hell-for-leather towards the lead-free goal, without an ounce
>>of proven scientific reason. On the other hand, the IPC is
>>opposing the halogen-free part of the same EU legislation,
>>despite the fact that emissions of incinerated
>>halogen-containing laminates may contain some highly hazardous
>>and polluting substances, as shown by scientific studies. At
>>the same time, it may lull exporters to the EU and members
>>within the EU into a false sense of security into thinking
>>that brominated flame retardants are here to stay, rather than
>>be mandatorily substituted within a few years.
>>
>>I need clarification on this paradoxical dichotomy.
>>
>>Brian
>>
>>---------------------------------------------------
>>Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using
>>LISTSERV 1.8e To unsubscribe, send a message to
>>[log in to unmask] with following text in the BODY (NOT the
>>subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or
>>(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
>>[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE
>>mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
>>[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the archives of
>>previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please
>>visit IPC web site
>>http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for
>>additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at
>>[log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
>>-----------------------------------------------------
>>
>
>
>

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2