TECHNET Archives

July 2003

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Wenger, George M." <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Sat, 26 Jul 2003 14:07:48 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
Michael,

 If you are experiencing brittle solder joint failures at and interface (e.g., "Black Pad" type failures) then you will most likely see higher levels of P at the interface than in the bulk ENi because there are two processes that concentrate the P.  During the ENIG process the immerson gold process replaces Ni atoms with gold atoms thus increasing the amount of P at the gold/nickel interface.  Then you solder the ENIG and the gold disolves in the solder and you consume a little more nickel during the formation of nickel-tin intermetallic thus concentrating the P again.  The brittle failures that occur happen at an interface and when you examine the two surfaces of the brittle fracture you usually find higher levels of P then in the bulk.  The best way to determine the P content in the bulk nickel is cross section a good solder joint and do SEM/EDX in the bulk of the nickel plating.



-----Original Message----- 

From: Creswick, Steven [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 

Sent: Fri 7/25/2003 11:11 AM 

To: [log in to unmask] 

Cc: 

Subject: Re: [TN] % Phosphorus In Nickel deposit







Michael,



It was my understanding the low to mid-phosphorus nickels (3-6%, 6-9%) were better for soldering, whereas high-phos (9-12%) nickels were better for corrosion resisitance.



In either case, won't the solder at the solder/nickel interface always be 'high' in phos, with the potential for bad intermetallics being present.



    However, I defer to the plating guru's of the forum.



Steve Creswick - Gentex Corp





-----Original Message-----

From: Michael Forrester [mailto:[log in to unmask]]

Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 10:19 AM

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: [TN] % Phosphorus In Nickel deposit





Is there a specification for the % phosphorous in the nickel deposit for

electroless

Nickel/Immersion Gold for surface mount pads on PWBs?  We are seeing as

high as 14% and are also seeing solder joint failures at the nickel

interface on

BGAs w/18mil balls.  Is there an industry standard for phosphorous content?

If there is no industry standard, any ideas of what the spec should be?

Thank you.



Best Regards,



Mike Forrester

LeCroy Corp.



---------------------------------------------------

Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e

To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in

the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet

To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)

To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest

Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives

Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional

information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315

-----------------------------------------------------



---------------------------------------------------

Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e

To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in

the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet

To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)

To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest

Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives

Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional

information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315

-----------------------------------------------------







------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This message is for the designated recipient only and may

contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.  

If you have received it in error, please notify the sender

immediately and delete the original.  Any unauthorized use of

this email is prohibited.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[mf2]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2