TECHNET Archives

July 2003

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Dave Hillman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Thu, 24 Jul 2003 06:20:22 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (70 lines)
Hi Bev! I haven't seen or heard of such a development but we should pose
your question to the IPC/EIA/JEDEC solderability committee to see what type
of response we get back, It seems pretty apparent that the component
fabricator; a) hasn't a clue about what solderability is; 2) or understands
completely what solderability is but has elected to not use a solderable
finish. Either way, can you find an alternative component? Has the
component fabricator confused solderability with moisture sensitivity
requirements?

Dave



                      Bev Christian
                      <[log in to unmask]        To:       [log in to unmask]
                      ET>                      cc:
                      Sent by: TechNet         Subject:  [TN] Short Solderability Time Limits
                      <TechNet@listserv
                      .ipc.org>


                      07/22/2003 04:43
                      PM
                      Please respond to
                      "TechNet E-Mail
                      Forum."; Please
                      respond to Bev
                      Christian






Technetters,
As if we didn't have enough problems with really, really old parts; part
numbers; moisture sensitivity; a few instances of stupid finishes as
suppliers go lead free; but now I have a new one - for me anyways.  We have
received virgin parts where the label on the bag says they only have a
SOLDERABILITY LIFETIME of 168 hours after they are taken out of the bag!
This is not a case where one can recover them by putting them in an oven
afterwards!  Anyone else seeing this new pain-in-the-neck development?
regards,
Bev Christian
Research in Motion
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700
ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2