TECHNET Archives

July 2003

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Thu, 17 Jul 2003 15:48:46 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (93 lines)
Could the 50 ug figure relate to uncleaned boards which have been put into
the Ionograph?

If so the number is meaningless as a measure of reliability or anything else
when evaluated against the number for a cleaned board. The Ionograph was
developed as a means of process control for cleaning rosin based fluxes that
met a now obsolete military flux specification.
The best you could say is that it is probably an indicator for the amount of
no clean flux present. No clean fluxes are defined as harmless if the
residue meets certain criteria, none of which includes amounts of residual
extractable ionics.

If the number is for a cleaned assembly then all we can really say for sure
is that the boards have a lot more extractable ionics on them than they
could have, [as amply demonstrated by the fact that the other techniques get
lower numbers].

If you were using a high solids rosin based RMA flux (say 35%) of the type
around when the Ionograph was invented, and put an uncleaned board into the
Ionograph it would likely go off scale, the total extractables would be
huge. But RMA fluxes are considered safe if uncleaned. Poorly cleaned they
may not be safe and that was the point of the test: to provide a means of
monitoring cleaning process effectiveness.


Regards

Mike Fenner

Applications Engineer, European Operations
Indium Corporation
T: + 44 1908 580 400
M: + 44 7810 526 317
F: + 44 1908 580 411
E: [log in to unmask]
W: www.indium.com
Pb-free: www.Pb-Free.com



-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Carroll,
George
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 9:09 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Ionograph reading for No clean v/s aqueous processed
(wa ter soluble flux)


Ken,
As the previous respondents have indicated, Ionograph results shouldn't be
used as a go-no-go.  Taking the process approach, what were previous results
from this vendor?  from other vendors providing similar boards?  Are there
components that would tend to hold flux under or near them?  That could
contribute to field reliability issues.  There may be those that disagree
with me, but 50 sounds a bit steep in comparison with no-clean boards that
I've measured.

George

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700
ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------

:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

This email, its content and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the addressee(s) and may be legally privileged and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient please delete and contact the sender by return and delete the material from any computer. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.

Messages sent via this medium may be subject to delays, non-delivery and unauthorized alteration. This email has been prepared using information believed by the author to be reliable and accurate, but Indium Corporation makes no warranty as to accuracy or completeness. In particular, Indium Corporation does not accept responsibility for changes made to this email after it was sent. Any opinions or recommendations expressed herein are solely those of the author. They may be subject to change without notice.

:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2