LISTSERV - TECHNET Archives - LISTSERV.IPC.ORG

TECHNET Archives

July 2003

TechNet@IPC.ORG

	LISTSERV Archives
	TECHNET Home
	TECHNET July 2003

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Show All Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Subject:	Re: Ionograph reading for No clean v/s aqueous processed (wa ter soluble flux)
From:	"Carroll, George" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:	TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:	Tue, 15 Jul 2003 16:09:28 -0400
Content-Type:	text/plain
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (22 lines)

Ken,
As the previous respondents have indicated, Ionograph results shouldn't be
used as a go-no-go.  Taking the process approach, what were previous results
from this vendor?  from other vendors providing similar boards?  Are there
components that would tend to hold flux under or near them?  That could
contribute to field reliability issues.  There may be those that disagree
with me, but 50 sounds a bit steep in comparison with no-clean boards that
I've measured.

George

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.IPC.ORG