DESIGNERCOUNCIL Archives

July 2003

DesignerCouncil@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jeff Seeger <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Mon, 14 Jul 2003 15:30:40 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
"Jack C. Olson" wrote:
>
> snip <
> If I have impedance controlled signals that are part of
> a circuit that is being run on +2.6V or +3.3V, but there
> is a closer plane available, like +5V, the signal returns
> will snap to the closer one, right?

        The return path will "snap" to the nearest hunk of
        metal available, regardless of what its DC function
        is.  This is an AC path - the return is seeking the
        lowest inductance way back, or the tightest possible
        loop.

        This can lead to all sorts of discussion in the EE
        and SI community, but the principles are fundamental
        to EMC (EMI).

--

      Jeff Seeger                         Applied CAD Knowledge Inc
      Chief Technical Officer                  Tyngsboro, MA  01879
      jseeger "at" appliedcad "dot" com                978 649 9800

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DesignerCouncil Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF DesignerCouncil.
To set a vacation stop for delivery of DesignerCouncil send: SET DesignerCouncil NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2