Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 14 Jul 2003 15:30:40 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
"Jack C. Olson" wrote:
>
> snip <
> If I have impedance controlled signals that are part of
> a circuit that is being run on +2.6V or +3.3V, but there
> is a closer plane available, like +5V, the signal returns
> will snap to the closer one, right?
The return path will "snap" to the nearest hunk of
metal available, regardless of what its DC function
is. This is an AC path - the return is seeking the
lowest inductance way back, or the tightest possible
loop.
This can lead to all sorts of discussion in the EE
and SI community, but the principles are fundamental
to EMC (EMI).
--
Jeff Seeger Applied CAD Knowledge Inc
Chief Technical Officer Tyngsboro, MA 01879
jseeger "at" appliedcad "dot" com 978 649 9800
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DesignerCouncil Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF DesignerCouncil.
To set a vacation stop for delivery of DesignerCouncil send: SET DesignerCouncil NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|