TECHNET Archives

June 2003

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steve Vargas <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Fri, 20 Jun 2003 09:18:29 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
All:

    As a SMT subcontractor, we see CAD files from many different sources.
An item of frustration for us is how some customers assign a Pin 1
designator to diodes. Primarily, we see Pin 1 being assigned to Cathode and
Pin 2 to Anode. For those customers who use Pin 1 to anode, we manually
rotate the part within our CAM system to stay consistent with what our
operators typically see on their visual aids. This is both cumbersome and
inefficient.
   I don't believe (or should I?) that there is an industry standard that
addresses this, but is there some type of defacto standard that exists
which I can use as evidence to some of our customers that they should
consider using the 'Pin 1 to cathode concept'? Thanks.

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2