TECHNET Archives

June 2003

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
JaMi Smith <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Wed, 18 Jun 2003 18:32:06 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (231 lines)
John,

We appear to be takling about apples and oranges. The size of a single
strand, and the finished size of the whole stranded wire containing the 36
strands.

If a single strand of the wire measures .001 inches, that is 0.0010 inches,
or 1.0 mil exactly, then that changes everything. That single strand is 50
gauge (50 AWG) according to the tables.

My original guess of 44 or 46 gauge (44 AWG or 46 AWG) was for each
individual strand, and was based on your original statement of a single
strand being 1.5 mil, or 0.0015 inches. That is why I suggested that you
carefuly measure it again.

I still don't see how you were comming up with gauges like 30 1/2, 31, or 32
for a single strand. Is it possible that you trying to state that the whole
stranded wire (with all 36 strands) was approximately that size?

JaMi


----- Original Message -----
From: "Grabski III, John R." <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 4:23 AM
Subject: Re: [TN] wire gauge calculation...


> The measurement for each strand was .001 inches... that's 1 mil...  this
was
> not in metric units...  for example, a wire with 19 strands @ .007" per
> strand would be close to 20 awg...
>
> - John Grabski III
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: JaMi Smith [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 5:03 PM
> To: TechNet E-Mail Forum.; Grabski III, John R.
> Cc: JaMi Smith
> Subject: Re: [TN] wire gauge calculation...
>
>
> John,,
>
> Your initial post stated that: "This cable has 36 strands, measuring 1.5
> mils per strand."
>
> I took that to mean that the diameter of each individual strand was
0.00150
> inches.
>
> Based on the tables, a 46 gauge wire is 1.57 mils (0.00157 inches)
diameter,
> and a 44 gauge wire is 2.0 mils (0.00200 inches) diameter.
>
> My gut feeling is that if you measure a single strand again it will turn
out
> to be 1.57 mils (as opposed to your original statement of 1.5 mils), which
> would mean that the individual strands making up your wire are each 46
> gauge.
>
> Is it possible that there is an error in your initial post, and are you
> meaning to say that your measurement was 0.15 mm diameter, as opposed to
1.5
> mils diameter?
>
> Is it possible that you are confusing "area" with "diameter"?
>
> Where are you getting your numbers?
>
> What is the total diameter of your wire (all 36 strands)?
>
> What would you say that you think the approximate AWG of the wire is
> (including all strands)?
>
> It seems that whatever the actual gauge, with the large number of very
fine
> strands, you may have a wire that is intended to be very flexable. The
"MIL"
> folks do this kind of thing occasionally.
>
> Is there per chance any marking on the wire itself or possibly the spool?
>
> JaMi
>
> * * * * * * * * * *
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Grabski III, John R." <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 12:58 PM
> Subject: Re: [TN] wire gauge calculation...
>
>
> > All my calculations are leading me towards 30 1/2, 31, and 32 AWG...
> Where
> > are you getting a 46 or 44 from my figures? :)
> >
> > -John Grabski III
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: JaMi Smith [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 1:53 PM
> > To: TechNet E-Mail Forum.; Grabski III, John R.
> > Cc: JaMi Smith
> > Subject: Re: [TN] wire gauge calculation...
> >
> >
> > John,
> >
> > Here is one link to a Coilcraft site and three links to Alpha Wire
> &Cable's
> > site.
> >
> > It looks like you are possibly dealing with 46 gauge wire, or even 44
> gauge,
> > and you might want to take another look at the exact measurements based
on
> > these charts.
> >
> > This Coilcraft link seems to agree pretty much with the link provided to
> > reawire in a previous post, although these charts only cover solid wire,
> and
> > not stranded, as it appears that you need.
> >
> > ===> http://www.coilcraft.com/awg.cfm
> >
> > ===> http://www.alphawire.com/pages/341.cfm
> >
> > ===> http://www.alphawire.com/pages/379.cfm
> >
> > ===> http://www.alphawire.com/pages/380.cfm
> >
> > Based on what I see by looking at the above charts, it appears that your
> > particular stranded wire may not be in accordance with the standard AWG
> > (American Wire Gauge) table, and might be fabricated to some other
> "gauge".
> > It may possibly be made to a "MIL" spec, although I am pretty sure that
> they
> > also conform to the "AWG" standard.
> >
> > Please note that some "MIL" spec wires do in fact have a large number of
> > small strands, and this would possibly be the answer to your specific
> wire.
> >
> > It occurs to me that there is also a "British Wire Gauge" of some sort,
> > although I have not heard of it in ages. Quite possibly there is also a
> > standard metric "Gauge" or two floating around out there that I am not
> aware
> > of.
> >
> > Please remember also that wire is measured in "Circular Mils", which is
> not
> > the same as the "Square Mils" that we are familiar with in dealing with
> > cross sectional area of a copper trace on a PC Board. A "Circular Mil"
is
> > only 78% of a "Square Mil".
> >
> > Also, if you do any internet searches, remember to search using the both
> the
> > spelling "gauge" and "gage", since both are used and both are considered
> > "correct"
> >
> > Hopefully this has been of some help,
> >
> > JaMi
> >
> > A quick search dug up the following additional information, although I
am
> > not sure how reliable it is:
> >
> > ===> http://www.reade.com/Conversion/wire_gauge.html
> >
> > ===> http://www.mogami-wire.co.jp/e/cad/wire-gauge.html
> >
> > ===> http://www.raelectrical.com/wire_gauge_conversion_chart.htm
> >
> > ===>
> >
>
http://www.metric.fsworld.co.uk/siwire_elect.htmhttp://www.metric.fsworld.co
> > .uk/siwire_elect.htm
> >
> > ===> http://www.pianoworld.com/wire_conversion.htm
> >
> >
> >
> > * * * * * * * * * *
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Grabski III, John R." <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 4:31 AM
> > Subject: [TN] wire gauge calculation...
> >
> >
> > > Good morning, all...
> > >
> > > Our cable assy plant uses a chart made by T.E.S.L.A. to calculate
> Circular
> > > Mil Area and wire gauge...  and for the most part it is completely
> > useful...
> > > But recently we received in some cable in need of calculation, and our
> > chart
> > > does not go smaller than 29 gauge though...  This cable has 36
strands,
> > > measuring 1.5 mils per strand.  Can anyone help me with a URL or a
> > makeshift
> > > chart including smaller wire gauges?
> > >
> > >
> > > Much appreciated.
> > >
> > >
> > > -John Grabski III
> > > Badger Technologies Inc.
> > >

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2