DESIGNERCOUNCIL Archives

June 2003

DesignerCouncil@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender:
DesignerCouncil <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Date:
Mon, 9 Jun 2003 08:44:20 -0700
MIME-Version:
1.0
X-To:
"Brooks,Bill" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To:
"(Designers Council Forum)" <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (257 lines)
Nicely said, Bill!

Bill Gebhardt, C.I.D.
Electrical Engineer
IPC Certified Interconnect Designer
Overland Storage, Inc.
San Diego, CA
(858)495-4222
[log in to unmask]
Treasurer - IPC Designer's Council, San Diego Chapter




                           "Brooks,Bill"
                      <[log in to unmask]>             To:       [log in to unmask]
                           Sent by:                  cc:
                                                     Subject:  Re: [DC] Core thickness/emissions
                           DesignerCouncil
                      <DesignerCouncil@listse         |-------------------|
                      rv.ipc.org>                     | [ ] Expand Groups |
                                                      |-------------------|

                           06/09/2003 08:37
                      AM
                           Please respond to
                      "(Designers Council
                      Forum)"; Please respond
                      to "Brooks,Bill"






I think Alexis was right to bring up the subject and I think it shows that
most of us understand the problem and critical nature of the design
requirements being spelled out in such a way as to not 'get it wrong' or
inconsistent from one vendor to another. The science that goes into the
design needs to be repeatable and consistent from one vendor to another and
you, the designer, control this with the appropriate notes and details on
the fab drawing.
On the other hand, if it is not a critical feature, please don't tie the
board vendor's hands.... Give them the allowable freedom to change things
that ARE NOT CRITICAL that favor their processes. (The question is... Is it
critical in this case?)

Let's say that the designer on this board went to a seminar and saw a
demonstration that defined the board stack up in great detail much in the
manner that this board is done, and he/she decided to use a similar tight
specific definition on all their boards regardless of the need to do so....
because it looked cool and impressive and made everyone think they knew
what they were doing. The board vendor has no way to know if the designer
specified the layering structure and types of materials and thickness
requirements unnecessarily or not. They have to assume that you know what
you are doing and that they may not deviate from it if they want your
continued good business. Most boards do not need this type of treatment.
Many RF applications DO NEED this kind of detail.

Perhaps this board MAY NOT NEED to be defined in the fashion it is and
COULD be altered without any undue harm to the layout and assembly. We just
don't know that without more information, but it's interesting to see the
other comments and assumptions. I did not see anything in his original
question that stated that the boards were already MADE. Perhaps they are in
the shop preparing to make them. As I would expect the shop to do, they
should call the designer with a question before taking any action.... And
indeed that seems to be the case. To lambaste the guy or shop is to jump to
conclusions... let him explain it more before calling him "dumb". That's
just rude JaMi.

The intent here is to learn from each other and we do not know it all. None
of us 'Know it all'. But we can fill in the gaps for each other and
collectively we are more than the individual could ever hope to be. Let's
use the forum to HELP each other not embarrass or ridicule.

Best regards,




Bill Brooks
      -----Original Message-----
      From: Tom Garman [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
      Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 8:05 AM
      To: [log in to unmask]
      Subject: Re: [DC] Core thickness/emissions

      Jami;
      Alexis is competent enough to ask the right questions. Most of the
      people I have dealt with consider the other person to be competent
      until proven otherwise. From your posting I can see that you have not
      had the same experience. I have worked in situations where I had to
      prove my competence. I did not enjoy those jobs very much. Most board
      designers do not have advanced degrees in electrical engineering nor
      are they clairvoyant. In my viewpoint it is a waste of an engineer's
      time to be laying out boards. The engineer should be reviewing the
      layout but unless he is at the low end of the salary scale it is not
      cost effective for him to do layout.

      PS I don't need to brag, I have witnesses.

      Tom Garman
      PCB Designer
      330-575-1636
      [log in to unmask]

            -----Original Message-----
            From: DesignerCouncil [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
            On Behalf Of JaMi Smith
            Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2003 3:00 AM
            To: [log in to unmask]
            Subject: Re: [DC] Core thickness/emissions

            Eric,

            Unfortunately, it is not a joke.

            I was just about to say that you obviously do not have any
            concept of what emissions testing is all about, either
            practically or legally, but then I looked at your email address
            and realized that you really do understand what is going on
            here, and appear to just be making light of it.

            It is not just a question of simply radiating interfering
            signals when you are dealing with a cell phone company that
            makes an RF Transmitter that people hold up to their heads.

            It also appears that you may have never spent long hours in
            emissions testing, trying to qualify a design, only to have to
            redesign it and requalify it after you have made a large
            production run that need to be scrapped, just because of some
            stupid idiot like the guy at the board house in this particular
            case, who probably just didn't have the right material in
            stock, or worse yet, had some extra material he just wanted to
            get rid of. This guy really does need to be called on the
            carpet.

            I don't want this idiot making any boards for me, and I really
            don't think that you want him making any boards for you.

            I want to know just who he is and who he works for, so that I
            do not make the mistake of sending him any business.

            This kind of incompetence is a problem in our industry, and we
            will never correct it by ignoring it or sugar coating it.

            Yes, incompetence is the correct word.

            I am sorry if I am calling a spade a spade.

            Why am I making an issue out of this? Because the average
            designer does not know what a monumental blunder something like
            this is.

            This is important, and it is important that anyone who is out
            there designing boards knows that it is important, even if he
            does not totally understand it.

            That's why it should not be sugar coated.

            That's why I am being so polite.

            I am sorry if you are offended, but once again, this is not a
            joke.

            JaMi

            * * * * * * * * * *
             ----- Original Message -----
             From: Eric Bonatti
             To: [log in to unmask]
             Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 4:53 PM
             Subject: Re: [DC] Core thickness/emissions

             Oh, come on JaMi, don't sugar-coat it.    Tell us like you
             really feel.

             Eric
             ----- Original Message -----
             From: JaMi Smith
             To: [log in to unmask]
             Sent: Friday, 06 June 2003 19:26
             Subject: Re: [DC] Core thickness/emissions

             The quick answer is: Yes! Absolutely! Unquestionably!

             ~ ~ ~



---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DesignerCouncil Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV
1.8d To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF DesignerCouncil. To set a
vacation stop for delivery of DesignerCouncil send: SET DesignerCouncil
NOMAIL Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources &
Databases > E-mail Archives Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional information, or contact
Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DesignerCouncil Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV
1.8d To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF DesignerCouncil. To set a
vacation stop for delivery of DesignerCouncil send: SET DesignerCouncil
NOMAIL Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources &
Databases > E-mail Archives Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional information, or contact
Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DesignerCouncil Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV
1.8d To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF DesignerCouncil. To set a
vacation stop for delivery of DesignerCouncil send: SET DesignerCouncil
NOMAIL Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources &
Databases > E-mail Archives Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional information, or contact
Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------










********************************************************************
See why Overland Storage is the leading provider of storage
management solutions.

For general information regarding Overland Storage:
http://www.overlandstorage.com

For more information on Overland's products, including our
award-winning Neo series:
http://www.overlandstorage.com/products
********************************************************************

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DesignerCouncil Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF DesignerCouncil.
To set a vacation stop for delivery of DesignerCouncil send: SET DesignerCouncil NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2