TECHNET Archives

May 2003

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Fri, 30 May 2003 09:09:11 +0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (85 lines)
Hi, Eric,

I haven't experiences it, but I've certainly heard about it from the
company that makes the X-Ray machinery we use. They did say that (with
their equipment) exposure would have to be quite prolonged to cause the
problem though. They did at least warn us when we asked the question about
X-Ray hardening or other damage.

Peter



Eric Castonguay <[log in to unmask]>     29/05/2003 08:03 PM
Sent by: TechNet <[log in to unmask]>

Please respond to "TechNet E-Mail Forum."; Please respond to Eric
Castonguay

              To:  [log in to unmask]
              cc:  (bcc: DUNCAN Peter/Asst Prin Engr/ST Aero/ST Group)
              Subject: [TN] X-ray beam damaging flash memories








Hi guys,
Never heard about this one in 4 years in the telecom industry. Our current
supplier of flash memories found a very interesting reason why we are
having problems with their parts. The strength of X-ray being used by the
CM on our cards for 5-dx analysis is too strong, they said. Industry
standard is 1K rad max I was told. Going above it causes issues with the
analog section of the programming in the die.

There were able to tweak the registers & re-test them and had no problems
with the chips.  They also tried re-exposing them and suceeded in repeating
the problem. I asked if we could do anything to fix boards that have
already been x-rayed and they said that this cannot be done once the parts
are assembled on the boards.

Considering that Flash is not the only component with an analog section in
it, I think that it would be a good idea to investigate the x-ray
equipment, strength & techniques at our CM, even if they use a standard
Agilent 5DX machine. But first I want to hear if some of you ever met this
problem before.

Thanks.
Eric

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700
ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------




[This e-mail is confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the
intended recipient, please delete it and notify us immediately; you should
not copy or use it for any purpose, nor disclose its contents to any other
person. Thank you.]

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2