TECHNET Archives

May 2003

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Rudy Sedlak <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Fri, 16 May 2003 13:17:36 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
Dave:

Stripping Solder is MUCH slower than stripping Tin, which is what they are
used to doing, so, I would watch carefully to insure that all the solder is
gone, especially in the holes.

I HOPE they intend to do this is a spray, conveyorized system, not in a tank,
the potential for excessive Copper attack in a tank stripping situation is
large, if they use the typical Nitric/Ferric Nitrate Tin/Solder stripper.  If
they use the older Ammonium Biflouride/Hydrogen Peroxide based stripper,
potential for Copper attack is minimized greatly.

Rudy Sedlak
RD Chemical Company

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2