TECHNET Archives

May 2003

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Valerie St.Cyr" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Thu, 15 May 2003 13:59:59 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
My OEM expectation is that if there are unpopulated sites they remain
virgin. I also agree that it would be very very prudent of the OEM to
document the depop sites and to write language on the module documentation
that depopulated footprints shall not have any material added (paste;
epoxy) to the pads.

Then I would definitely expect a call if they were accidently pasted.

For 2 versions of the same base board with different component adds (depop;
pop some; pop all ...) I would expect the OEM to have either different part
numbers or different version numbers; whatever their system and one the EM
understands the implications of.

So, question from the OEM to the EMs: is this a big deal? why?

Valerie

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2