TECHNET Archives

March 2003

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Eddie Rocha <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Thu, 27 Mar 2003 09:37:14 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
Removing "dead" pads should be considered on high layer counts.
For example 12 layers with 1 oz copper on all layers means that the
drill bit will go thru 12 oz of copper. Maintaining good hole wall
quality for a 10 mil hole means that this board would definitely have
to be drilled one high. Not to mention that the maximum hit count for
the 10 mil drill bits would most likely need to be reduced. This same
board with "dead" pads removed could most likely be drilled two
high and no change to the maximum hit count per drill bit. Both
these actions affect the cost of the board.

A robust plating process is required when practicing "dead" pad
removal because the pads do help anchor the plating down the hole
wall. Most reputable PCB fabricators won't have a need for "dead"
pads.

This is my two cents.

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2