TECHNET Archives

February 2003

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Dougal Stewart <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Dougal Stewart <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 15:54:30 -0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (74 lines)
Hi Mark,
you didn't seem to get any responses, so I thought I'd comment.
The equipment maintenance guy is correct, you can remove the frame and
connect each anode and work rail by individual cables. The normal routine is
to use solid busbars to the non moving part of the agitation frame and cable
from there. Most people try to connect both ends of the anode rail by cable,
and similarly the work rail, as this gives 2 points of contact on each
rather than just one, and it appears to even out the current. I think it
adds a further complication, as a poor connection will create a hot spot and
reduce the current going to the product. At least with just one connection,
if it's faulty you know about it (voltage rises on the rectifier).
Dougal Stewart

email:  [log in to unmask]
phone: +44 1896 822204
mob:    +44 7984 629667
www.pwbsolutions.co.uk
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Hargreaves" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 2:18 PM
Subject: [TN] Cu plater config


> Hi All,
> The copper  "ladders" on one of our Cu plating tanks (500 gal.) are due
for
> a rebuild.
>
> Currently, each "ladder" consists of a rectangular Cu frame with  cross
bars
> bolted/ welded in place (the anodes & panels hang from these crossbars).
> Current is supplied from the rectifier to each crossbar via a separate
> cable.
>
> Our equipment maintenance guy suggested that we can remove the rectangular
> frame (cost consideration) without reducing plating consistency/
efficiency.
> He would attach U shaped blocks to the tank rim to support each crossbar.
>
> (I think the frames are a carryover from the old days when we used fewer
> cables).
>
> Seems to me that this should work fine.  What do you think?
>
> Many Thanks,
> Mark Hargreaves
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
> To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
> Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
> Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
> information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700
ext.5315
> -----------------------------------------------------
>

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2