TECHNET Archives

February 2003

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender:
Subject:
From:
"Munie, Gregory" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 10 Feb 2003 13:40:19 -0600
MIME-Version:
1.0
X-To:
Reply-To:
"TechNet E-Mail Forum." <[log in to unmask]>, "Munie, Gregory" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
Does anyone use IPC Test Method 2.4.46 for testing the wetting of solder
paste to copper coupons?

We are having an internal debate here over how to interpret "spread" for a
lead free alloy.

In general we get a "wetted area" larger than the print but there is
evidence of some pull back/dewetting, i.e. a dome of solder within a
somewhat larger dewetted circle.

As some Tin/Copper intermetallics are not easily wetted once they have
formed should the area of wetting be calculated on whole area covered or
just the solder "dome"?

At these lead free high temperatures how do I interpret wetting and
de-wetting from intermetallic formation?

Greg Munie

Kester Solder

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2