TECHNET Archives

November 2002

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Dehoyos, Ramon" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Thu, 7 Nov 2002 09:23:18 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (74 lines)
        The more accurate way in my view, because it  changes  the
environment the least, is to use fine  thermocouple wire  that can be fed in
between the solder balls and the wire either glued or taped at  least 0.5
inches away from the PGA so not to interfere much with the environment.
        Regards,
        Ramon

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tobias.Chang [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 11:25 AM
> To:   [log in to unmask]
> Subject:      [TN] profiling BGAs
>
> A couple quick questions regarding temperature profiling of BGA's at a
> re-work station.
>
> I posted maybe a month back and from the (2) responses I gather that
> drilling holes to feed the thermocouples from under the board is the
> standard practice.
>
> I tried this, however the best I could do was *attempt* to ensure that
> there
> was contact between the tip of the thermocouple and a BGA solder ball.
> (the
> thermocouples came up from under the board, and I tried to place the BGA
> such the tips of the thermocouples would be in contact with the side of a
> BGA ball.  I have 3 thermocouples (middle, side, corner) under the BGA,
> and
> the BGA is held down by chip bonder at 2 opposite corners)  When I tried
> getting temperature values at the re-work station, I was getting
> inconsistent numbers.
>
> The other method I've tried was to use thermally conductive adhesive to
> hold
> a thermocouple between the chip and the board (with no drilling -> ie. the
> thermocouple wire lies flat against the board and held down by the
> adhesive
> and the chip).  This method seems to result in more consistent temperature
> readings.
>
> Can anyone comment on whether the adhesive method is used and reliable, or
> if theres something I'm doing wrong with the drilled board method?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Toby Chang
> Process Engineerin Co-op
> Leitch Technology International Inc.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
> To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
> Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
> Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
> information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700
> ext.5315
> -----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2