TECHNET Archives

November 2002

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Mon, 25 Nov 2002 23:30:59 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (108 lines)
I think it is not the same, -40 to 85C, it is not the Delta T that kills
the parts but rather the -40C
Solder act differently at -40 compared at 0C.  We are getting here the
fatigue at extreme temperatures

So it should not be the same (-40 to 85 and 0 to 125).
So Yuan, the parts interconnect  could have been brittle at -40C. Trace
lay-out, board thickness, CTE's
Soldermask or Non-SMD could be a factor to that problem.


regards

Jonathan Noquil
WW Pkg Research Center



                                                                                                                                       
                      Volkmar Huss                                                                                                     
                      <volkmar.huss@DRA        To:       [log in to unmask]                                                               
                      EGER.COM>                cc:                                                                                     
                      Sent by: TechNet         Subject:  Re: [TN] Thermal cycling test failure modes                                   
                      <[log in to unmask]>                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                       
                      11/25/2002 11:05                                                                                                 
                      PM                                                                                                               
                      Please respond to                                                                                                
                      "TechNet E-Mail                                                                                                  
                      Forum."; Please                                                                                                  
                      respond to                                                                                                       
                      Volkmar Huss                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                       




Hi Yuan,

based on what I have learned about thermal cycling tests, it is not the
low temperature that ' kills the part' but the higher delta T of 165K
compared with 125K, an increase of 32%.  To prove this, you can run a
-40C to +85C profile which should have the same result as the 0C to 125C
profile.

             Volkmar

Yuan Li wrote:

>
>
> We have seen some interesting phenomenaduring TCT. We compared 0-125C
> to -40- 125C. For the same package, we had no failures after 2000
> cycles with the 1st profile, but had 1st failure @ 500 cycles with the
> 2nd profile. It appears that the -40 C excursion is what kills the
> part.The most common failure we saw was substrate trace crack. The
> substrate was 2-2-2 build-up BT substrate. I know at -40C Young's
> modulus is higher. Is it a major factor? Any other factors? Why -40C
> would make sucha big difference?
>
> Recall there were some discussions on this topic, however, cannot find
> them. Any papers or on line info available?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Yuan



  Volkmar Huß, C.I.D.

  Engineering Electronic Circuit Boards
  Aufbau- und Verbindungstechnik
  _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

  DRÄGER ELECTRONICS

  Draeger Electronics GmbH
  Moislinger Allee 53-55
  D-23558 Lübeck

  Tel:   +49-451-882-3998
  Fax: +49-451-882-4365
  mailto:[log in to unmask]
  Website http://www.draeger-electronics.com
  _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Important Notice
This email and any attachment hereto are confidential and may contain trade
secrets or may be otherwise protected from disclosure. If you have received
it in error you are in notice of this fact. Please notify us immediately by
reply email and then delete this email and any attachment from your system.
Please understand that you are not allowed to copy this email or any
attachment hereto or disclose its contents to any other person. Thank you.

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2