TECHNET Archives

October 2002

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Bissonnette, Jean-Francois" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Thu, 31 Oct 2002 10:03:24 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (92 lines)
Agreed with all that was said about the drawings overruling IPC however I
was
face with a situation regarding electrical clearance once that was not very
obvious
at first but could turn into some monster if all conditions were met.

We ask our suppliers to build as per Class 2.  All the leads were within the
max
lenght.  On a particular IC, a lead bent horizontally would not violate
electrical clearance,
but... if two pins (side by side) would be bent toward each other while
being manipulated
(and we had close calls a few times) a short could have occured.  We had to
ask a specific
lenght to avoid mishaps.

At first I assumed that the leads on your boards would not cause that and
did not replied...
but just in case... assuming is not always the right thing to do!!!

JF

-----Original Message-----
From: Keith Calhoun [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 8:05 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Lead protrusion


We are having a vigorous discussion about how to deal with lead
protrusion on our thru hole boards.  We build mainly IPC class 3 boards,

and have two Contact Systems CS400-D thru hole insertion machines that
we use to populate these boards.  Discrete parts are not a problem, as
the leads are crimped to retain the parts in the boards for wave
soldering.  Our area of concern is DIP packages along with sockets, and
connectors.  When we insert DIPs we clinch two opposing corner pins,
connectors and sockets are retained with temporary solder mask (goop).
we are finding that the leads on these parts tend to exceed the max lead

protrusion permitted for class 3 boards when used in .06 nominal
thickness boards, but do not want to get into the quagmire of trimming
leads and inspecting or reflowing after trimming.  These boards will
meet the class 2 requirements, and there is no danger of violating the
minimum electrical spacing requirements when these boards are installed
in our systems.

Anyone else having this problem?  If so, how did you resolve it?  Your
support is greatly appreciated.


  Keith Calhoun
  Manufacturing Engineer
  Sierra Research, an Integrated Defence Technologies company
  485 Cayuga Road PO Box 222 Mail Stop 334
  Buffalo
  New York
  14225
  USA
                                         Fax: (716)631-7849
                                        Work: (716)631-6434
                                        <[log in to unmask]>

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700
ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------


WABTEC CORPORATION CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE
The content contained in this e-mail transmission is legally privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named herein. If the reader of this transmission is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this transmission is strictly prohibited.

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2