 
| Subject: | |
| From: | |
| Reply To: | TechNet E-Mail Forum. |
| Date: | Tue, 8 Oct 2002 13:36:14 -0500 |
| Content-Type: | multipart/mixed |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I think it really depends on what type of first article process you are referring too and the goals of the review. If the review is for first time builds and the goal is to confirm manufacturability I feel this needs to involve more than the machine operator. If the first article is a repeater product and the goal is to confirm a process setup. in those instances a sanity check is nice and most times can be performed by another operator in the same department.
Being proactive and making sure what you are about to produce meets the product requirements. Then confirming the process is deemed worthy is not stupid or a waste of time. Everyone makes mistakes and can do a no brainer oops. 5 minutes up front can save hours later.
Kathy
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2715.400" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY style="MARGIN-TOP: 2px; FONT: 8pt MS Sans Serif; MARGIN-LEFT: 2px">
<DIV><FONT size=1>I think it really depends on what type of first article
process you are referring too and the goals of the review. If the review
is for first time builds and the goal is to confirm manufacturability I feel
this needs to involve more than the machine operator. If the first article
is a repeater product and the goal is to confirm a process setup. in
those instances a sanity check is nice and most times can be performed by
another operator in the same department. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=1></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=1>Being proactive and making sure what you are about to produce
meets the product requirements. Then confirming the process is deemed
worthy is not stupid or a waste of time. Everyone makes mistakes and can
do a no brainer oops. 5 minutes up front can save hours later.
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=1></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=1>Kathy </FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
