TECHNET Archives

October 2002

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
X-To:
"TechNet E-Mail Forum." <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Date:
Tue, 29 Oct 2002 12:13:25 -0800
Reply-To:
"TechNet E-Mail Forum." <[log in to unmask]>, Rey Sosa <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Rey Sosa <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
<7EDB294F3EE1744BA2AB357D5C3957980257B38A@us-bv-m05>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (59 lines)
Glenn,
 I don't think the difference is going to be significant enough, assumming
they are eutectic solder spheres. What needs to be considered is
reliability. Motorola did a study in 1996 which indicated that NSMD pads
were significantly more reliable.

Regards,
Rey Sosa
Pentagon EMS

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Glenn Pelkey
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 10:48 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] SMD and NSMD pads on same BGA


Technetters,

        There is a proposed design here that incorporates Solder Mask
Defined (SMD) and Non Solder Mask Defined (NSMD) BGA pads on the same part.
Solderable area on the pad is the same for both as is the solder ball
diameter to place.  I'm concerned about coplanarity, but I don't have any
data to back it up.  I know the SMD balls will be higher off the substrate
than the NSMD balls, but by how much?  The reason for this design is
electrical performance.

        What do you think?  Is the amount of variation in height too small
to be concerned about?

Thanks,

Glenn

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700
ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2