Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | TechNet E-Mail Forum. |
Date: | Wed, 11 Sep 2002 23:28:36 EDT |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Syed,
>Is the reason that Tessera parts do not "need" underfill that their finish
>is not underfill friendly? Otherwise is the underfill not expected to
>increase the life of the flipchip systems?
No. Tessera-concept-based CSPs have compliancy built into the package
effectively decoupling the low-CTE die from the package solder pads and thus
also from the high-CTE PCB. You certainly could underfill them, but you do
not need to to assure SJ reliability in that fashion--so whhy would you want
the extra expense and non-repairability of an underfill?
Werner Engelmaier
Engelmaier Associates, L.C.
Electronic Packaging, Interconnection and Reliability Consulting
7 Jasmine Run
Ormond Beach, FL 32174 USA
Phone: 386-437-8747, Fax: 386-437-8737
E-mail: [log in to unmask], Website: www.engelmaier.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|