TECHNET Archives

August 2002

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Richard Carruth <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Thu, 1 Aug 2002 08:46:41 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (61 lines)
Could somebody tell me what a type 3, class 2 PWB isaccording to IPC 6012?
Got a problem here with some boards that have annular ring on some holes that is
less than .002", some only about half.
Us lowly uneducated production types think this is unacceptable. But we have
always refered to IPC 600. The QE. however feels that IPC 600 does not apply
since it is not designated on the drawing. He says they should be acceptable
under 6012 but we don't have a copy.
 How does everyone else feel about using these boards? This is a goofy program
anyway. We are "fixing" what the Q.E. calls voids in the solder that are
actually the open ends of hollow connector pins.
 Thanks
Charles Caswell

Charles,

Class 2 requirements in 6012A table 3-5 Minimum Internal and External Annular
Ring states:
For Class 2 PTH, 90 deg. breakout of the hole from land is allowed when visually
assessed. For external lands, the land/conductor junction SHALL NOT be reduced
below the allowable width reduction in 3.5.3.1 The conductor junction should
never be less than 0.002 inches or the minimum line width, whichever is smaller.

For Class 3 PTH, The minimum external annular ring SHALL NOT be less than 0.002
inches. The minimum functional internal annular ring SHALL NOT be less than
0.00098 inches.

The minimum external annular ring may have 20% reduction of the minimum annular
ring due to defects such as pits, dents, nicks, pinholes, or splay in the
annular ring of isolated areas.

Section 3.5.3.1Conductor Width Reduction states: Allowable reduction of the
minimum conductor width (specified or derived) due to isolated defects (i.e edge
roughness, nicks, pinholes and scratches) which expose base material SHALL NOT
exceed 20% of the minimum conductor width for Class 2 and 3.

It would be hard for me to say good or bad without knowing what the annular ring
dimension should be (did you loose 20% of conductor width) or without seeing the
board. If you have any that are less than the 0.002 then they are indeed out of
specification and the others are right on the border.

I hope this information helps. I suggest purchasing a copy of the IPC 6012A
valuable information inside.


Regards,
Richard Carruth
Quality Eng.
LaBarge Inc.
Ph# 918-459-2346

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2