TECHNET Archives

June 2002

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Kasprzak, Bill (sys) USX" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Mon, 3 Jun 2002 09:39:41 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (159 lines)
Folks,

I believe that Steve's original post was intended to query the legitimacy of
the product he was talking about. He should not be blamed for anything. He
was sincere. The fact that a bunch of us, me included, responded to some of
the non-technical responses just happened, that's all. People were venting
and adding personal experience they may have had. Deleting a message without
reading is fast and easy.

I had a similar experience a few months ago when I asked about "cordless ESD
straps". I honestly didn't know that this item was not technically feasible.
It also brought out a few NTC responses. But hey, if you don't honestly know
something, this is a great forum to ask. I would hate to think that you
might not post an honest question simply because it might result in some NTC
responses.

I apologize to anyone offended by this NTC post.

Hey Earl, you don't need to take a few weeks off.

Bill Kasprzak
Moog Inc. Manufacturing Engineering, Electronics


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Mathis [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 8:23 AM
> To:   [log in to unmask]
> Subject:      Re: [TN] OT- wasn't an experiment.. (The other side)
>
> Steve wrote:
> "I understand Jacks admonition about all the emails that the server deals
> with when we get off on a tangent like this. But on the other hand, if it
> were a controversial "Technical" subject, there would be the same volume
> of
> traffic...so what's the real difference? High traffic that's relevent, or
> off-topic traffic? Traffic is traffic, posts are posts, the server doesn't
> know what is relavent...and doesn't work any harder on one, than the
> other."
>
> I think it's great that people get close and want to keep up with what's
> going on with each other. But here's the difference:  I (and others, I
> bet)
> don't want to weed through a bunch of irrelevant, off-topic, personal
> comment posts looking for real information, which is why I'm signed on the
> the forum to begin with.  If you all want to make your off-topic comments,
> that's fine, just address them to your pals, not to the entire forum.
> I've
> signed off of these forums for months at a time because they devolve into
> an
> AOL chatroom with all of this stuff.
>
>
> >From: [log in to unmask]
> >Reply-To: "TechNet E-Mail Forum." <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
> >To: [log in to unmask]
> >Subject: [TN] OT- wasn't an experiment..
> >Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 22:26:03 EDT
> >
> >I first posted the question as a honest inquiry to the RF/ Cell phone
> >people
> >to try and really learn if the gizmo's that are being sold really work or
> >not. Thought that the list would be a very appropriate place to post this
> >question.
> >
> >As far as my Gregory post, Jason has been a long time technetter, and was
> >recently displaced from his job from other forces...I just thought I
> would
> >relay that he had found employment...that's all, and add a humorous twist
> >to
> >it.
> >
> >I think that those of us that have been members on this list for a while,
> >like to hear what happens to each of us when our situations change. I
> think
> >that those of us that have been on the list for a while, have got to know
> >each other, and we like to hear about how each of us are getting along...
> >
> >I didn't mean to "stir the pot" so to speak, but I guess I did.
> Occasional
> >"pot stirring" isn't a bad thing though.
> >
> >I understand Jacks admonition about all the emails that the server deals
> >with
> >when we get off on a tangent like this. But on the other hand, if it were
> a
> >controversial "Technical" subject, there would be the same volume of
> >traffic...so what's the real difference? High traffic that's relevent, or
> >off-topic traffic? Traffic is traffic, posts are posts, the server
> doesn't
> >know what is relavent...and doesn't work any harder on one, than the
> other.
> >
> >Blame it all on me, I'm the bad guy...I'm in the mood for taking blame
> >right
> >now. Bought a used Electrovert Omniflo-10 reflow oven that everybody was
> >counting on to be delivered, and up and running in just a couple of days,
> >and
> >it doesn't look like that's going to happen for various reasons, so my
> name
> >is crap right now...I'm in the mood for taking criticisms, let me have
> >it...
> >
> >Maybe I should just unsubscribe...sorry about everything.
> >
> >-Steve Gregory-
> >
> >-------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --------
> >Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
> >To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> >the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> >To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]:
> >SET Technet NOMAIL
> >To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
> >[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
> >Search the archives of previous posts at:
> http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
> >Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for
> additional
> >information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700
> >ext.5315
> >-------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --------
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
> http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------
> Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]:
> SET Technet NOMAIL
> To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
> Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
> Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
> information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700
> ext.5315
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2