TECHNET Archives

June 2002

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Ingemar Hernefjord (EMW)" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Tue, 25 Jun 2002 09:02:27 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (188 lines)
David,
these people aren't aware they will never be able to sleep after reading your paper..I presented your reality file for some here, after that they unplugged my copy machine....he-he
Ingemar

-----Original Message-----
From: Lusby, Jack R. [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: den 24 juni 2002 21:32
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Cleaning of Military PWAs That Have Been Soldered
withNo -CleanFlux


David,

I would also like to get a copy of your paper since we have experience
issues associated with contamination on mil spec CCA's

Thanks,
Jack Lusby
Northrop/Grumman ESSS
[log in to unmask]
direct (410)552-2886
fax     (410)981-5361

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Debbie Kenney [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:16 PM
> To:   [log in to unmask]
> Subject:      Re: [TN] Cleaning of Military PWAs That Have Been Soldered
> withNo -CleanFlux
>
> I would also like to get a copy.
>
> Debbie Kenney
> Engineer
> M-Flex / AMT
> Direct  (714) 688-5242
> Fax     (714) 996-3834
> [log in to unmask]
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Gordon F. Davis Jr [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> > Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 4:30 AM
> > To:   [log in to unmask]
> > Subject:      Re: [TN] Cleaning of Military PWAs That Have Been Soldered
> > withNo-CleanFlux
> >
> > May I get an e-copy of the paper you refered to as well.  I also work
> for
> > a
> > military supplier, but we clean everything.  I would like to get further
> > info on no-clean.
> >
> > Gordon Davis
> > Application Engineer
> > Rockwell Collins
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > David Douthit <[log in to unmask]>@ipc.org> on 06/20/2002 09:10:13 PM
> >
> > Please respond to "TechNet E-Mail Forum." <[log in to unmask]>; Please
> > respond
> >        to David Douthit <[log in to unmask]>
> >
> > Sent by:    TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
> >
> >
> > To:    [log in to unmask]
> > cc:
> >
> > Subject:    Re: [TN] Cleaning of Military PWAs That Have Been Soldered
> >        withNo-CleanFlux
> >
> >
> > You have landed in a very nasty area. You are correct to be concerned
> > about
> > contamination issues.
> > Even if the residues from the flux do not create migration/leakage
> current
> > problems they may
> > collect other airborne contaminates that can cause problems.
> >
> > Process, shipping, and storage control are critical to the reliability
> of
> > the circuitry.
> >
> > If you wish I have a paper I presented in May of 2001 titled
> > "Avionics Systems, Reliability, and Harsh Environments"
> > that I could e-mail you. The information in the paper will
> > give you a good idea of what type of airborne contamination
> > issues you may have to deal with.
> >
> > David A. Douthit
> > Manager
> > LoCan LLC
> >
> > Bogert wrote: 6/20/2002 Folks is anyone manufacturing military PWAs
> using
> > no-clean flux and not cleaning the PWAs prior to shipment?  If so, what
> is
> > your reliability experience with this process? We are considering a
> > military application (Class 2) where mixed technology (SMT and PTH) PWAs
> > will be soldered using no-clean flux and then not conformal coated
> > (assuming the uncoated PWAs can pass our temperature/humidity
> > qualification
> > testing).  Although the no-clean flux we will use should be benign (we
> are
> > having SIR testing performed to confirm this and Omegameter testing), I
> am
> > concerned that contamination may be introduced by other shop processes
> > such
> > as mechanical assembly, testing, etc., even if one uses gloves or
> fingere
> > cots during handling.  One could argue that after shipment, since the
> PWAs
> > are not conformal coated, you can introduce contamination in the field
> and
> > therefore, why not not clean prior to shipment. We may be performing
> board
> > testing (boundry scan, bed-of-nails, etc) on PWAs that have been
> soldered
> > using no-clean flux.  I understand that certain noclean flux can impede
> > this testing, and also, may cause problems in event we need to conformal
> > coat the PWAs. Any comments on this subject will be appreciated.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > -------
> > Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
> > To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
> in
> > the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> > To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]:
> > SET Technet NOMAIL
> > To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
> > [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
> > Search the archives of previous posts at:
> http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
> > Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for
> additional
> > information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700
> > ext.5315
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > -------
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------
> Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]:
> SET Technet NOMAIL
> To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
> Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
> Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
> information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700
> ext.5315
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2