TECHNET Archives

June 2002

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mark Hargreaves <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Mon, 24 Jun 2002 11:22:55 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (190 lines)
Dougal,
A little harshly stated perhaps, but this USA board fab agrees with your
tolerance comment.  If used, I'd hope that tolerance would be limited to
specific components.  Almost anything's doable, but +/- 1 would affect price
and yield at our shop.

Very little assembly experience here, so I can't respond to the soldermask
dams comment, except to say that most of our customers require them, and
sometimes relax registration tolerances rather than "ganging".

Regards,
Mark Hargreaves

        -----Original Message-----
        From:   Dougal Stewart [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
        Sent:   Saturday, June 22, 2002 7:30 AM
        To:     [log in to unmask]
        Subject:        Re: [TN] Registration of soldermask

        Well, I'm impressed and I see why you USA board fabs stay in
business ! Even
        the best automatic printers with optical registration would find it
hard to
        achieve 0.001" positional tolerance - the heat from the lamps
exposing the
        artwork will make the artwork shift by more than this..... So, if
this is
        what you specify, you will have to pay the price, which is either
scrap or
        rework at the fab house, which they should add onto your board
price, or is
        absorbed by the fabricator, who then goes out of business trying to
achieve
        the physically near impossible. After that you will go to the far
east for
        your supply where they will ignore your requirement (sorry, not
understand)
        and you are back to having ganged openings or reduced pad width.
        I have only come across one soldermask capable of achieving a
soldermask dam
        of less than 0.004", as normally the undercut will remove the dam if
the
        artwork is less than 0.006". To achieve dams on a 20 mil pitch
device (which
        is actually 19.685 mil), use a 10 mil pad, and just state that you
require
        solder dams.
        Why don't you allow ganged openings - what part of your assembly
process
        can't you control? Is it solderpasting, position of paste screen,
volume of
        paste, or positioning of components?

        Dougal Stewart

        email:  [log in to unmask]
        phone: +44 1896 822204
        mob:    +44 7984 629667
        ----- Original Message -----
        From: "Greg Scott" <[log in to unmask]>
        To: <[log in to unmask]>
        Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 11:19 PM
        Subject: Re: [TN] Registration of soldermask


        > Loan,
        >
        > What we do is design with 2mil per side opening with a solder mask
note:
        >      No finished solder mask over pad edge.  Annular ring of
exposed board
        material around pad edge to
        > be .001 min, .003 max.
        >      Maintain  a solder mask bridge of .004 min. wide between fine
pitch
        solder pads.
        >
        > Also the pad can not be wider then .012 with this approach.  Do
not allow
        for ganged soldermask
        > relief.  We had all
        > rework problems with that approach.
        > Have not had problems since this note.
        >
        > Greg Scott
        > Cray Inc.
        > Seattle, WA.
        >
        > "Tempea, Ioan" wrote:
        >
        > > Hi technos,
        > >
        > > what would be a reasonable requirement for the registration of
the
        solder
        > > mask on boards with 20 mils fine pitch having solder mask dams.
We asked
        for
        > > 0.002" and it almost comes over the edges of the pads.
        > >
        > > Is 0.001" doable, with no impact on the price?
        > >
        > > Thanks,
        > > Ioan
        > >
        >
        >
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
        -------
        > > Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using
LISTSERV 1.8d
        > > To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with
following text
        in
        > > the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
        > > To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]:
        SET Technet NOMAIL
        > > To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
        [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
        > > Search the archives of previous posts at:
        http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
        > > Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for
        additional
        > > information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700
        ext.5315
        >
        >
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
        -------
        >
        >
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
        -------
        > Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV
1.8d
        > To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following
text in
        > the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
        > To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]:
        SET Technet NOMAIL
        > To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
        [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
        > Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
        > Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for
additional
        > information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700
        ext.5315
        >
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
        -------
        >


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
        Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV
1.8d
        To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following
text in
        the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
        To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL
        To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
        Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
        Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for
additional
        information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5315

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2